Laserfiche WebLink
<br />This approach has proven very helpful for congressional delegations, for several reasons. Foremost, the <br />delegation members do not need to reconcile the different interests of a particular region. A joint local <br />effort relieves them of playing the role of arbitrator or mediator in sometimes difficult matters of local <br />importance. In turn, the congressional delegation can focus on advocating strongly for widely accepted <br />local priorities, which is a role they have repeatedly stated they prefer. Furthermore, the extensive <br />research and development that goes into producing the Federal Agenda eases the burden on <br />congressional staff in terms of preparing project justifications and advocating for funding. The <br />delegation’s staff often comes to depend on the reliability and accessibility of the UF’s Federal Agenda, <br />and the local staff who produce it. Consequently, the process helps build solid, ongoing relationships <br />that extend far beyond the merits of any one set of Federal Agenda projects. <br /> <br />The City Council must adopt the Federal Priorities Project List each year. The recommended Federal <br />Priorities Project List begins with a review of opportunities for funding in the next Federal budget and <br />goals that are specific to Eugene or the area. <br /> <br />Throughout the year, staff has looked into federal funding opportunities and unmet funding needs to <br />develop a list of potential projects for inclusion on the FY 2011 Federal Priorities Project List. On <br />November 12, 2009, the IGR Committee met with staff and our federal lobby firm Smith, Dawson and <br />Andrews, to discuss and review a list of potential priority projects for inclusion on the 2010 Federal <br />Priorities Project List. From that meeting, a list of possible federal funding opportunities was developed. <br /> <br />The proposed 2010 Federal Priority Projects were presented to the IGR Committee on December 16, <br />2009. The IGR Committee unanimously approved, with one possible addition (see note below), the <br />recommended 2010 Federal Priorities Project List (Attachment A) and directed the list move forward to <br />the full City Council for action. The final list will become part of the UF federal agenda which will be <br />presented to the area’s congressional delegation, executive department staff, and other potential funding <br />sources in Washington, D.C. in March 2010. <br /> <br />Note: As part of the 2009 United Front Federal Priorities list, the City of Eugene included a request for <br />an air monitoring station as part of Lane County’s BioEnergy Production Facility request. The original <br />request for the air quality monitoring station was to ensure the efficacy of the facility’s basic <br />requirement to reduce or eliminate the air quality impacts from grass seed burning in the central and <br />southern Willamette Valley. However, in 2009, the Oregon State Legislature passed Senate Bill 528 <br />which ended most field burning in Oregon. Additionally, the Lane Region Air Protection Agency <br />(LRAPA) recently determined it would site an air quality monitoring station in west Eugene and has <br />identified funding to install the station, although it is still trying to identify funding for ongoing <br />operation of the station. Accordingly, because field burning has been eliminated in the southern <br />Willamette Valley and an air monitoring station is being installed in west Eugene by LRAPA, the 2009 <br />request for the air monitoring station is not recommended for inclusion on the 2010 Federal Priorities <br />Project List. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Adoption of the federal priority recommendations is the making or affirming of the City of Eugene’s <br />policy with respect to federal legislative issues or such other matters as may come to the council from <br />the IGR committee. <br /> <br /> Z:\CMO\2010 Council Agendas\M100113\S100113A.doc <br />