Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT A <br />the respective water rescue teams. USAR Team response is managed by the coordination of on- <br />duty team members that arrive at the scene and then function as team members or respond to Fire <br />Station 2 to staff USAR apparatus and respond to the scene as a team. For larger emergencies, <br />off-duty team members are called back to work. <br />A cooperative services model would allow for focused staffing and boat response from stations <br />that are best positioned to deploy to the launch sites in each jurisdiction. A Water Rescue Team <br />presence at Stations 4, 6, and 11 would allow for rapid deployment to the launch sites at Hayden <br />Bridge, Alton Baker, Armitage Park, Celeste Campbell, and “D” street, and would allow for a <br />reserve boat launch at the unimproved launch at Beltline. <br /> <br />Urban Search and Rescue would function by having the closest truck/tower company respond to <br />the incident and begin size-up and initial operations with the crew and equipment on trucks. The <br />Rescue Unit from both jurisdictions (Heavy Rescue 5 and Rescue 2) would respond with USAR <br />staffing to the incident location to coordinate a full on-duty team response. Larger incidents <br />nd <br />would involve response with the Oregon State regional semi-trailer stored at the 2 & Chambers <br />Street location. Both the Eugene and Springfield USAR teams are part of a State regional con- <br />sortium. <br /> <br />No personnel savings or cost is associated with consolidation in this operational area, as Special <br />Operations services are provided by existing Shift Operations (line) personnel and managed by <br />an existing Deputy Chief. However, the teams themselves would be larger, allowing for greater <br />staffing flexibility on the line and a more efficient and effective Special Teams response. Under <br />consolidation, there would be on-going review of staffing levels to see if personnel efficiencies <br />and dollar savings could be achieved in the future. <br /> <br />Logistics and Fleet <br /> – Eugene Fire & EMS operates a Logistics Section that provides courier; <br />fleet management; facilities management; supply, order, and distribution; equipment manage- <br />ment, repair, and maintenance; and uniforms. Springfield Fire & Life Safety currently has no <br />staff dedicated to the Logistics functions, and instead utilizes a variety of line personnel (primari- <br />ly Captains) to accomplish most tasks on overtime. The total annual staff cost for Springfield is <br />estimated at $200,000, equating to approximately 2.0 FTE. <br /> <br />The Logistics Section would be closely reviewed to determine whether new efficiencies could be <br />gained to net a $200,000 saving or whether some of this saving would need to be spent on en- <br />hancements to accommodate Springfield. Cost reductions through bulk purchases, standardiza- <br />tion, cooperative agreements, etc., could be substantial over time. <br /> <br />Fleet management services are also addressed differently in the two departments. For apparatus <br />replacement, Eugene is operating under a 10-year contract (through June 2016) with Hughes Fire <br />Equipment. Apparatus specifications are developed by the Apparatus Committee and approved <br />by the Fire Chief or designee. The majority of service work is performed by the City’s Fleet <br />Services Section, though some specialized work is done by outside vendors. <br /> <br />Springfield Fire & Life Safety, meanwhile, is currently funding new fire apparatus by leasing. <br />The current strategy is to lease apparatus when replacements are needed, to reduce cash outlay <br />and stretch limited dollars. Ambulance replacement is fully funded through a replacement ac- <br />7 <br />ATTACHMENT 1 <br /> <br />