Laserfiche WebLink
� r <br />This document addresses concerns of high technology firms i n <br />re] ati on to si ti ng of new faci l i ti es. Fi rms surveyed as part of thi s <br />study rated their preferences for different combinations of topography <br />and vegetation. The results reflected a strong preference for high -image <br />sites. Shifting of the special light industrial site to the center of the <br />Basin responds to this desire and would provide Eugene with an expanded <br />inventory of attractive sites for major high-technology firms . <br />E. Industrial Lands Task Force Report. <br />The report of the Industrial Lands Task Force, April 1981, reviewed <br />and supplemented findings and policies pertinent to industrial locations <br />outlined in the Metro Plan. The report finds that; <br />1. Important locational factors indentified for high - <br />techno l ogy firms i ne l ude proper plan designation, proper <br />zoning designation, availability of public ci services, <br />compatability with existing and future surrounding uses <br />and image of the site. <br />2. The report also concluded that some of the largest <br />electronic firms ( as Tektronix and Hewlett-Packard) <br />are interested in sites of 150 acres, but noted that other <br />smaller fi rms* (compri the majority 'of the potential <br />users) were interested in sites between 10 and 50 acres in <br />s i z e . <br />3. In relation to light-medium i ndustri al activities, the <br />Report notes that the most recent industrial growth in the <br />metropolitan area has been almost entirely in the light - <br />medi um category. <br />4. The Task Force Report recommended that until more is <br />l earned about the demand for light-medium i ndustri al land, <br />the cities should continue to maintain a variety of sites, <br />fully serviced, in a variety of locations. <br />W hile the special light industrial site designated as part of the <br />Metro Plan responds to some of these criteria, the land use arrangements <br />proposed in the Planning commissions recommendation better meet the <br />direction provided by-these criteria and other locally adopted policies, <br />and need established in p of the Metro Plan and technical <br />supporting documents, such as the "Economic Working Papers.' <br />1. Size - The approximately 200 -acre special-light i ndustri'al <br />site in the Commission's recommendation is in one ownership and <br />can provide s -i ti ng potential for a major user. This would add a <br />second site to the L i-ty' s potential inventory of speci a l - <br />industrial sites in excess of 150 acres in size, thereby <br />providing greater degree of choice for major firms seeking <br />potential sites in the City. Because the special -light <br />industrial site identified in the Metro Plan is split into about <br />twenty separate parcels (not all of which are under one <br />ownership) , it may be less desirable by a potential major firm. <br />1 <br />