Resolution No. 3716 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

3 EXHIBIT A BETHEL- DANEBO REFINEMENT PLAN UPDATE REVISIONS AND ERRATA SEPTEMBER 139 1982 Deletions are shown in [brackets]. Additions are underlined Porti ons not listed remain the same as the April 28, 1982, draft. 1. Add text to the second paragraph of the introduction (Page 1) to clarify the description of the plan area: " The Plan Area The study area on the west is bounded by Greenhill Road, wh i ch is the westerly limits of the urban growth boundary, then runs east along Barger Avenue to the existing city limits line, along the city limits line to Beltl i ne Road, and northwesterly to Highway 99 North. Then the boundary extends south along Highway 99 North to Jessen Avenue, then south and easterly along the existin city l i mi is line, wh i ch is adjacent to the Southern Pacific R ai l road yards to the spur wh'i ch creates the Coos Bay branch of the Southern Pacific Railroad. The boundary then extends westerly along the boundary between the residential area south of Roosevelt Boulevard and the industrial area north of Cross Street to Highway 99 North. From Highway 99 North to the west, the boundary is delin- eated by the proposed Roosevelt Boulevard and storm channel separating existing and proposed residential and industrial uses west to [Greenhill Road] Danebo Avenue. West of Danebo Avenue, the southern boundary is defined b y the between the existin residential zonin on the north and industrial zoning on the south to the Amazon Slou h then continues due west to Greenhill Road." 2. Following the second paragraph of the introduction (Pagel), add anew subsection entitled "Plan Contents" to di scu ss s plan format and the role of Policies, Proposals, the Land Use Diagram, Neighborhood Goals, and Findings, as follows: "Plan Contents The plan i s divided into three elements: I. Land Use, II. Urban Services and the Urban Growth Boundary and III. Trans ortati on. Each element includes an intro- duction, back round material , and recommendations in the form of policies and' ro osal s . Polices are adopted by the City Council as ui des for decision- - making related to the plan area. Ci t programs,, actions, and decisions such as zone changes, traffic pattern changes and ca ital improvements wi 1 be evalu- ated on the basis of their ability to im l ement these of i ci es as well as other ado t ed C - ity goal s and of i c i es . Because the are ado ted b the council as the Cat s ui e for action policies are the most im ortant statements in the p lan, Proposals are suggestions for im l ementin of icies of this plan. In g eneral , they wi 11 be further reviewed and studied and may or ma not be im l e- mented in the form in which they appear in the l an . They are reco n i zed as ideas which have been suggested after some public discussion as possible was to implement the plan, but are not adopted as City po 1 icy. The plan also includes Nei hborhood Goals an Fin in s. Neighborhood goa s are statements in icatin Be