Laserfiche WebLink
that if the council wished to reconsider an ordinance approved on November 9, it would need to take action <br />and an explanatory memorandum had been distributed to councilors explaining the process. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to reconsider the motion <br />to adopt Council Bill 5016, an ordinance amending the Eugene-Springfield <br />Metropolitan Area General Plan Land Use Diagram; amending the Willakenzie <br />Area Plan, and returning the “River Ride” site to the low density residential <br />designation. The motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to divide Council Bill <br />5016 into two ordinances, one related to the land over which the City has sole <br />jurisdiction and the other related to the land over which the City and County have <br />joint jurisdiction. The motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to postpone action on the <br />two ordinances until Monday, November 23, 2009. <br /> <br />Councilor Brown asked if action taken by the council to approve a MUPTE application at its last meeting <br />could also be reconsidered. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy noted that a memorandum from City Attorney Glenn Klein stated that the MUPTE action <br />could not be reconsidered because contractual obligations were now in place. <br /> <br />The motion passed unanimously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Ms. Jerome cited Mr. Klein’s memorandum regarding the MUPTE action. She said that MUPTEs were <br />governed by state law and City code and once an application was approved there were no provisions that <br />would allow the council to repeal or terminate the resolution; termination could only occur if the developer <br />failed to comply with conditions of approval. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor expressed concern that not all councilors were present when the MUPTE action was taken. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz was not certain the outcome for that application would have been changed if all councilors <br />had been present. She commented that she supported MUPTEs, but that particular application had not met <br />all of the requirements. She felt it was important that future MUPTE applications fully comply with the <br />conditions for approval. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 9:38 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Jon Ruiz <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Lynn Taylor) <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 16, 2009 Page 9 <br /> Public Hearing <br />