Laserfiche WebLink
<br />testimony from 16 persons at the hearing and nine persons submitted written testimony during the <br />public comment period. The public comment period was held open until September 15, 2009. <br /> <br />On September 14, 2009, staff met with the Planning Commission and provided them examples to <br />demonstrate how the proposed code amendments to Chapter 9 and EC 7.420 would apply to <br />different properties/locations. <br /> <br />On October 12, 2009, the Planning Commission completed its deliberations on the Chapter 9 and EC <br />7.420 code amendments and made two motions. The first motion recommended City Council <br />adoption of the proposed access management, special setback, traffic impact analysis, and temporary <br />surfacing code amendments. The second motion recommended reintroducing the ordinance <br />addressing alley width standards. <br /> <br />On January 25, 2010, staff presented the Planning Commission an alternate code amendment <br />addressing the alley width standards based on feedback from outreach provided to the neighborhood <br />groups since its October 12, 2009, meeting. The Planning Commission approved staff’s <br />recommendation to leave Table 9.6870 as is and revise the Chapter 9 amendments to include <br />language that would allow staff to recommend an alley width less than the width requirements <br />shown in Table 9.6870. <br /> <br />Overview <br />The Access Connection Location Requirements, Special Setbacks, and Street Width ordinance <br />includes proposed land use related code amendments initiated to balance safe and efficient roadway <br />operation against the need to provide ingress/egress for developed lands adjacent to the roadway <br />system. The ordinance for Access Connection Design and Construction Requirements is the access <br />management implementation-related code amendments for construction and use of the public right- <br />of-way. In combination, the proposed access management code revisions will reduce and separate <br />the conflict points along the arterial and major collector streets by managing access connections and <br />protecting intersection influence areas. <br /> <br />Conflict Point. <br />The point of potential collision where vehicle paths cross, merge into or diverge with <br />one another, pedestrians or bicycles. <br /> <br />Intersection Influence Area <br />. That area beyond the physical intersection of two rights-of-way that <br />comprises the upstream decision and maneuver distance, plus any required vehicle storage length, and <br />the downstream recovery distance of the primary street, and the protected corner clearance distance of <br />the secondary street. <br /> <br />In addition to the access management code revisions, staff processed four related land use code <br />corrections and clarifications in conjunction with access management ordinance development. <br />Utilizing the access management code revision process provided a timely opportunity to correct <br />some problematic elements of existing code. The elements included clarification of arterial/collector <br />street special setback standards, correction of traffic impact analysis application requirements, <br />temporary surfacing permit clarifications, and clarification of alley width standards in existing <br />developed areas. <br /> <br />Summary of Access Location Requirements, Special Setbacks, and Street Width Ordinance <br />EC 9.0500 Definitions. Definitions for “access connection” and “driveway” have been added. <br /> Z:\CMO\2010 Council Agendas\M100208\S100208A.doc <br /> <br />