Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ATTACHMENT A <br />IGR BILL REPORT <br />JANUARY 27, 2010 <br />REPORT DATE RANGE: JANUARY 11, 2010 thru JANUARY 20, 2010 <br />CITY OF EUGENE <br />LC 24 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to transportation; creating new provisions; amending ORS 366.752, <br />805.092, 810.438 and 818.200 and section 2, chapter 859, Oregon Laws 2007, <br />sections 3 and 4, chapter 823, Oregon Laws 2009, and section 5, chapter 865, <br />Oregon Laws 2009; and declaring an emergency. <br />Title: Eliminates required contribution for statewide multimodal study after June 30, <br />2009. Makes technical correction to law governing allocation of amounts <br />generated by increases in vehicle registration fees. Alters requirements for low- <br />speed vehicle and medium-speed electric vehicle safety standards. Provides that <br />moneys received by Oregon Historical Society from issuance of Pacific <br />Wonderland registration plates may be used for purposes other than establishing <br />and maintaining Oregon History Center at State Capitol. Requires that, under <br />certain circumstances, photo radar sign indicate school is in session. Expands <br />scope of variance permits. Directs Department of Transportation to submit <br />quarterly report on revenue raised from certain increased fees and taxes. Declares <br />emergency, effective on passage. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Policy Policy No Recommendation <br />Larry Hill CS-FIN 01/11/2010 Monitor <br />Comments: This appears to be a collection of odds and ends and technical fixes. There is nothing in <br />the current draft that is alarming for cities. Because of the broad relating clause it should <br />be monitored and amendments should be closely examined. I recommend monitor. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Policy Policy No Recommendation <br />Eric Jones PW-ADM 01/20/2010 Monitor <br />Comments: I would recommend a position of monitor priority 2 for Legislative Concept 24 any and <br />all concepts relating to the transportation bill, particularly because it seems like there's <br />going to be some wrangling over transportation bill amendments, and we need to track <br />these amendments to determine if any present significant issues to the City. I do not see <br />any significant issues in this LC, as drafted. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Policy Policy No Recommendation <br />Rob Inerfeld PWE 01/20/2010 Monitor <br />Comments: I agree with Eric's comments. <br />1 | Page <br /> <br />