Laserfiche WebLink
<br />th <br />AM peak hour and LOS B in the PM peak hour, and the Willamette Street/24 Place intersection <br />currently operates at LOS A in both the AM and PM peak hours. As shown in Table 8 of the <br />November 18, 2009 materials, both intersections are projected to continue to perform at these <br />same levels of service in 2015 under the current residential designation, and under the proposed <br />plan designation. As the proposed amendment will not reduce the performance of an existing or <br />planned transportation facility below the minimum acceptable performance standard or worsen <br />the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise projected to <br />perform below the minimum acceptable performance standard, no transportation facilities are <br />significantly affected and therefore, no mitigation is required pursuant to OAR 660-012-0060(2). <br /> <br />It is noted that, although Table 8 of applicant’s November 18, 2009 materials shows that the <br />th <br />eastbound movements of the Willamette/24 Place intersection are projected to perform at an <br />LOS F in 2015 as a result of the amendment, the overall intersection is projected to perform at LOS <br />A. An important factor in calculating intersection performance is the measure(s) of effectiveness, <br />which is the basis for determining level of service. For a signalized intersection it is average <br />stopped delay (vehicles waiting during red displays or the Volume to Capacity ratio), while <br />unsignalized intersections are evaluated for average total delay (seconds per vehicle summed for <br />all movements on all approaches and averaged). The applicant’s materials show the Willamette/ <br />24th Place intersection (an unsignalized intersection) delay per approach, per movement, which <br />shows eastbound left turns at LOS F; however, when the sum of all delay is averaged, the <br />intersection will achieve LOS A, which is performing within TransPlan standards. <br /> <br />Based on the available evidence, the proposal complies with Statewide Planning Goal 12 as <br />implemented through OAR 660-012-0060. <br /> <br />Goal 13 - Energy Conservation: To conserve energy. <br /> <br />Statewide Planning Goal 13 is directed at the development of local energy policies and <br />implementing provisions and does not state requirements with respect to other types of land use <br />decisions. The proposed site is located in a developed, urban area, where any future development <br />of the property can make efficient use of energy with direct and efficient access to the existing <br />transportation system and other urban services. In addition, the applicant’s written statement <br />(page 8 of the Refinement Plan narrative) describes how the amendment may promote re-use of <br />existing development and building materials, thereby conserving energy. To the extent that Goal <br />13 is applicable to the proposed change in designation, the applicant’s related findings are <br />incorporated herein by reference. Based on the above, the proposal is consistent with Statewide <br />Planning Goal 13. <br /> <br />Goal 14 - Urbanization: To provide for an orderly and efficient transition from rural to urban land <br />use. <br /> <br />The proposed amendment does not affect the transition from rural to urban land use, as the <br />subject property is within the City limits. Therefore, Statewide Planning Goal 14 does not apply. <br />Findings – South Willamette Properties Page 7 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />