Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Goal 5 - Open Spaces, Scenic and Historic Areas, and Natural Resources: To conserve open space <br />and protect natural and scenic resources. <br /> <br />The following administrative rule (OAR 660-023-0250) is applicable to this post-acknowledgement <br />plan amendment request: <br /> <br />(3) Local governments are not required to apply Goal 5 in consideration of a PAPA unless the <br />PAPA affects a Goal 5 resource. For purposes of this section, a PAPA would affect a Goal 5 <br />resource only if: <br /> (a) The PAPA creates or amends a resource list or a portion of an acknowledged plan or <br />land use regulation adopted in order to protect a significant Goal 5 resource or to <br />address specific requirements of Goal 5; <br /> (b) The PAPA allows new uses that could be conflicting uses with a particular significant <br />Goal 5 resource site on an acknowledged resource list; or <br /> (c) The PAPA amends an acknowledged UGB and factual information is submitted <br />demonstrating that a resource site, or the impact areas of such a site, is included in <br />the amended UGB area. <br /> <br />The proposed amendments do not create or amend a list of Goal 5 resources, a plan or a land use <br />regulation adopted in order to protect a significant Goal 5 resource or to address specific <br />requirements of Goal 5, and do not amend the acknowledged Urban Growth Boundary. <br />Therefore, it is clear that the proposed amendments do not trigger the need to consider Goal 5 <br />pursuant to OAR 660-023-0250(3)(a) or 3(c). <br /> <br />Some analysis is required to determine whether OAR 660-023-0250(3)(b) triggers the need to <br />consider Goal 5. (3)(b) asks whether ‘[t]he PAPA allows new uses that could be conflicting uses <br />with a particular significant Goal 5 resource site on an acknowledged resource list.” <br /> <br />The forested slopes on a portion of the site were identified on the City’s 1978 inventory of “Scenic <br />Areas” (April 12, 1978 Scenic Sites Working Papers, Figure H2), which is a part of the City’s <br />acknowledged Goal 5 inventory. The adopted working papers define standards for identifying sites <br />and characteristics of scenic sites, but do not set the level of protection to be assigned to these <br />sites. <br /> <br />Although the site was identified on the 1978 inventory, no further protection of the site was <br />assigned through subsequent processes. While the Willow Creek Special Area Study (1982) <br />identified certain natural conditions that would necessitate development to occur under <br />additional land use approvals, the site does not fall within the identified characteristics, nor is the <br />site identified as having wetlands in the West Eugene Wetlands Plan (2000). These site <br />characteristics and wetlands are discussed further in the concurrent zone change findings at EC <br />9.8865(2) below, in regards to the adopted Willow Creek Special Area Study and West Eugene <br />Wetlands Plan policies. As no further Goal 5 protection measures have been locally adopted for <br />the subject site, the residential uses allowed by the plan amendment would not adversely affect <br />the Goal 5 “Scenic Area” site. <br /> <br />Findings – Lane Memorial Gardens (MA 08-1and Z 09-1) Page 3 <br /> <br />