My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2C: Ratification of IGR Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 02/22/10 Meeting
>
Item 2C: Ratification of IGR Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:33:58 PM
Creation date
2/19/2010 11:27:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/22/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Wilson commented that the bill would need a lot of work to pass. She agreed that the bill was the <br />beginning of a larger conversation. One of the most interesting things that had come from the discussion <br />had been that no one could define what kind of plastic bags the bill would apply to. She did not think <br />there would be enough time in the month of February to address the bill. <br />Ms. Ortiz, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to Monitor Senate Bill 1009. <br />Mayor Piercy approved of adopting a Monitor position. She averred that it was important to be open to the <br />bill’s intent conceptually. <br />The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br />Senate Bill 1059 <br />Ms. Wilson said staff had recommended an Oppose position on the bill. She related that the bill had been <br />introduced by the President of the Senate, who had been a member of the Greenhouse Gas Task Force. <br />She noted that Councilor Alan Zelenka had been the City’s representative on the task force and that he had <br />also a member of the work group that had drafted the report. She related that the bill indicated that it had <br />been at the request of the task force. She stated that President Courtney had responded to questions by <br />saying he had promised to introduce a bill but he had not said it “would be good.” She said the bill did not <br />adequately reflect the recommendations of the task force; specifically it provided no mention of how the <br />directions would be taken on by local government or how it would be paid for. She also noted that several <br />other groups had come out against it throughout the state saying that the bill just did not reflect the <br />recommendations of the task force. She remarked that everyone was opposed to the bill. She averred that <br />the City would “have to get in line to oppose this bill.” She did not predict the bill would go anywhere as <br />written. The chairs of both the House and Senate Transportation Committees did not think they had the <br />votes to get the bill out. <br />Mayor Piercy had spoken with Mr. Zelenka. She commented that it was not unusual to send something to <br />the legislative counsel and then have it come out something completely different. She thought there would <br />be some attempt to address the issues and get the bill more in line with what had come out of the task <br />force. <br />This bill was pulled for discussion purposes only. <br />Ms. Ortiz recalled that people had testified before the City Council in regard to a marine reserve proposed <br />for the City of Newport. She asked if Ms. Wilson had any updates on it. Ms. Wilson replied that she had <br />not heard anything. She said she would look into it. She surmised that the funding could be coming <br />through a state agency and it would be in a state agency budget bill. She added that it had received a lot of <br />federal funding. <br />Mayor Piercy thought Mr. Zelenka intended to bring a resolution in support of the reserve. She noted that <br />it was not to be confused with the facility that the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration <br />(NOAA) had proposed to locate in Newport, a proposal that was being hotly contested by the State of <br />Washington. <br />Ms. Taylor, seconded by Ms. Ortiz, moved to adopt the staff recommendation for priori- <br />ties and recommendations for all bills that were not pulled for discussion for the present <br />meeting and the committee action for all bills that were discussed and acted up on at the <br />meeting. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations February 3, 2010 Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.