Laserfiche WebLink
Comments: Monitor - if it changes much it could be of more concern to the City. I concur with Ethan <br />that this concept is of more interest to EWEB that it is to the City. The proposed <br />clarification of standards for electricity portfolios aligns with the City's general <br />sustainability and energy awareness goals. It will likely impact electricity rates, which <br />would have social and economic impacts. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Policy Policy No Recommendation <br />Ethan Nelson 01/13/2010 Pri 3 Support <br /> PDD-BPS <br />Comments: Spoke with Jason Heuser and this is part of EWEB's acquisition strategy, but the Oregon <br />only component aligns with the mechanics of the RPS. If the legislation allowed power <br />outside of Oregon to comply with the standard, then the RPS levels need to be adjusted <br />for this, which won't likely happen. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Policy Policy No Recommendation <br />Mike Penwell 01/19/2010 -- -- <br /> CS-FAC <br />Comments: I will defer to Ethan on this LC as it is outside my area of expertise. <br />LC 137 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to the neglect of foreclosed real property; and declaring an emergency. <br />Title: Prohibits owner of foreclosed residential real property from neglecting real <br />property during periods of vacancy. Permits local government to assess civil <br />penalty for each day during which owner fails to remedy conditions of neglect. <br />Sunsets January 2, 2014. Declares emergency, effective on passage. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Policy Policy No Recommendation <br />Richie Weinman 01/27/2010 -- -- <br /> PDD-DEV <br />Comments: Defer to Mike McKerrow. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Policy Policy No Recommendation <br />Glenn Klein 01/06/2010 Monitor <br /> CS-CMO- <br />ATTY <br />Comments: Subsection (8) of section 1 of the bill does make clear that the bill would not preempt <br />local ordinances. In light of that, I recommend a “monitor” status, just to make sure that <br />the bill is not amended to preempt our authority and require us to use this new statutory <br />process. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Policy Policy No Recommendation <br />Mike McKerrow 01/27/2010 Monitor <br /> PDD-BPS <br /> <br />Comments: I support Glenn's comment with the "monitor" status just in case the language changes. <br />Contact Respondent Dept Updated Priority Policy Policy No Recommendation <br />Mark Whitmill 01/27/2010 -- -- <br /> PDD-BPS <br /> <br />2 | Page <br />