Ordinance No. 20454 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Based on the low bid received, the costs listed below were the estimated assessment costs plus contingency calculated at the time of the formation of the LID. Paving 10 -foot (per front foot) $116.11 Paving 7 -foot (per front foot) $81.28 Sidewalk and drive aprons (per square foot) $6.17 Wastewater (per square foot) $0.41 Wastewater service (per each) $3,317.45 Total Estimated Assessable Cost $ 635,963.37 Total Estimated City Cost: w/o Low Income Subsidy: $ 1,830,375.50 Total Estimated Project Cost $ 2,466 The total project costs increased from the estimated total project costs due to additional road base needed for the project and additional administrative costs associated with the federal funding. LOW INCOME SUBSIDY Of the 13 properties in the LID, two owners qualify for a subsidy under the low -to- moderate income subsidy program. This City funded subsidy program is available to property owners who occupy a single family dwelling or duplex and meet other program criteria. The total cost for the low— income subsidies is $13,724.32 RECOMMENDATIONS The City Engineer has provided the Hearings Official with an assessment report that outlined the above information and that recommended approval of the assessment as calculated. A public hearing regarding the proposed assessment was held on February 3, 2010. The minutes of this hearing are attached to these Findings and Recommendations. as Exhibit "A." No members of the public testified at this hearing. Based upon the information provided by the City Engineer's office at the February 3, 2010 public hearing, the Hearings Official finds that the final improvement costs proposed to be assessed are less as those quoted at the local improvement hearing and are comparable to or lower than projects of similar size. The Hearings Official further finds that the proposed assessments are calculated in accordance with the Eugene Code and that the project is one for which the assessments are for a local improvement as set forth in ORS 310.140 because: (1) The assessments do not exceed actual costs; (2) The assessments are imposed for a Capital Improvement Construction Project which provides a specific benefit to a specific property or rectifies the problem caused by a specific property; (3) The assessments are imposed in a single assessment upon completion of the project; and (4) The assessments allow the property owners to elect to pay off with interest over at least ten (10) years. Findings and Recommendations for Final Assessment -- Job 3923 Page 3