Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ATTACHMENT H <br /> <br />General Obligation Bond – Funding Option <br /> <br />A General Obligation (GO) Bond is a borrowing or issuance of debt, the repayment of which is made <br />from a property tax levied upon all taxable property in the City. Under this funding scenario, the City <br />could ask voters to approve an $8.2 million GO Bond ($8 million for the project and bond issuance costs) <br />to fund the LCC project cost. The City would also issue a $1.2 million General Fund bond. Detailed <br />information is provided in the chart below and followed by a simplified cash flow. (Note: The chart <br />format is the same in each funding option attachment.) <br /> <br />Sources of Funds Termination of tax increment financing in the Downtown District generates <br /> <br />o <br />several funding sources (See Attachment G): <br />New on-going property tax revenue for <br /> <br />- <br />? <br /> <br />on-going services <br />? <br /> <br />annual payments on a $1.2 million General Fund bond <br />Existing excess cash returned to City - $1.5 million <br /> <br />- <br />Amount remaining under the $33 million cap - $0.9 million <br /> <br />- <br />GO Bonds of $8.2 million issued to pay for the LCC project and bond costs <br /> <br />o <br />Total sources through FY19 ~ $25.5 million <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />This scenario assumes that the downtown loan program continues and is not <br />depleted to pay for project costs. <br />Uses of Funds All recommended projects <br /> <br />o <br />Police officers are funded from new General Fund property taxes on-going at <br /> <br />o <br />$740,000 starting in FY11 <br />Total uses through FY19 ~ $25.5 million <br /> <br />o <br />How it Works Voters approve a new property tax. See below for a cash flow projection that <br />shows how the various sources are available to pay for project and on-going <br />costs. <br />Implementation Costs Interest on debt ~$5.9 million <br /> <br />o <br /> Bond issuance costs ~$300,000 ($150,000 for each bond) <br /> <br />o <br />Project legal and professional services ~$150,000 <br /> <br />o <br />Project administration through FY19 ~$900,000 <br /> <br />o <br />Impact on taxpayers Compared to the current situation, the average taxpayer would pay about <br />$7.34 more per year, consisting of a reduction of $1.66 per year due to <br />termination of tax increment financing, and $9 per year for the new GO bond. <br /> (See Attachment E for example tax statement.) <br />Effect on M5 tax rate For schools – Staff has requested information from the tax assessor on this <br /> <br />o <br />cap and will forward to council when received <br />For general governments – small additional amount available under the tax <br /> <br />o <br />rate cap; since there is no compression currently, no impact on revenues to <br />city or county <br />For bonded debt – not included in M5 tax rate cap, so no effect <br /> <br />o <br />Financial Impact on Redistributes existing Downtown Urban Renewal cash (one-time) <br /> <br />o <br />overlapping taxing Ends ongoing redistribution of taxes to Downtown Urban Renewal District <br /> <br />o <br />districts (See Attachments G & L for projected amounts available annually if tax <br />increment financing were to be terminated.) <br /> <br />