Laserfiche WebLink
II. Introduction <br />Scientists have become increasingly alarmed at what they see as a real risk that the Earth’s <br />climate will change rapidly and drastically over the next several decades. These changes <br />pose a real threat to populations that depend upon our existing predictable weather patterns, <br />whether they are human, animal or plant. These changes pose threats to humans and to <br />animal and plant populations that are adapted to existing climatic conditions. The climatic <br />changes that are developing and are predicted to occur will drastically affect water <br />availability, agricultural productivity, the abundance of natural resources, and the frequency <br />and severity of flooding and other weather-related emergencies. <br />In 2004, the Governor’s Advisory Group on Global Warming concluded: “Global warming is <br />not just another environmental issue. … Absent decisive actions across the globe … [t]he <br />impacts of such changes on Oregon citizens, businesses and environmental values are likely <br />to be extensive and destructive. Coastal and river flooding, snowpack declines, lower <br />summer river flows, impacts to farm and forest productivity, energy cost increases, public <br />health effects, and increased pressures on many fish and wildlife species are some of the <br />iii <br />effects anticipated by scientists at Oregon and Washington universities.” <br />The economic impacts of inaction are large. A report produced for the University of <br />Oregon's Climate Leadership Initiative's Program on Climate Economics by ECONorthwest <br />estimated that if nothing is done to reduce GHG emissions, Oregon will face approximately <br />$3.3 billion in annual costs, which could translate to an individual tab of about 4 percent of <br />iv <br />annual household income by 2020. <br />Oregon has prided itself on being ahead of the curve when it comes to addressing <br />environmental issues. The Governor and the Legislature have developed policies to curtail <br />practices and activities that contribute to the likelihood and severity of adverse climate <br />change. <br />In 2007, the Legislative Assembly accepted the challenge of climate change by adopting <br />House Bill 3543 (codified at ORS 468A.205), and declaring “it is the policy of this state to <br />reduce GHG emissions in Oregon pursuant to the following GHG emissions reduction goals <br />by: <br />(a)2010, arrest the growth of Oregon’s GHG emissions and begin to reduce GHG <br />emissions <br />(b)2020, achieve GHG levels that are 10 percent below 1990 levels <br />(c)2050, achieve GHG levels that are at least 75 percent below 1990 levels.” <br />In 2008, the Governors Transportation Vision Committee presented five transitional “pillars” <br />of a future framework, including “Ensure Oregon’s transportation system meets the state’s <br />vi <br />goals for reducing GHG emissions.” Reducing GHG emissions from the transportation <br />sector will require Oregonians to have choices in how they travel, the transportation systems <br />that serve them and the towns and neighborhoods in which they live and work. As the state’s <br />population and economy grow, Oregon will be unable to meet its emission reduction targets <br />if Oregonians have no choice but to continue driving as much as the average household does <br />today. New planning initiatives are needed in the state’s fast-growing metropolitan areas to <br />enable communities to provide a mix of transportation choices — walking, biking and transit <br />Page 3 <br />