My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Greenhouse Gas Report
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 04/12/10 Work Session
>
Item B: Greenhouse Gas Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:13:27 PM
Creation date
4/9/2010 10:09:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/12/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V.Potential Fiscal and Other Resource Needs to Implement Land Use and <br />Transportation Scenarios <br />HB 2186 charge: The task force shall evaluate potential fiscal and other resource needs to <br />implement land use and transportation scenarios described in paragraph (a) of this <br />subsection, including staffing and resources needed by state agencies, local governments and <br />each metropolitan planning organization. (Section 10(2)(b)). <br />Preliminary research over a dozen case studies presented to the Task Force showed overall <br />project costs to conduct a scenario planning process ranged from a low of $250,000 to more <br />than $3 million. The Central Lane MPO estimates that its Region 2050 Study, conducted <br />between 1999 and 2006 cost the agency more than $1,000,000, which does not include the <br />costs incurred by each partner agency that participated. In addition to the MPO costs, <br />impacts to ODOT and DLCD budgets are roughly estimated to be two to three million dollars <br />annually, after the initial round of work. However, to adequately assess the costs requires <br />additional study of three key components: <br />- <br />Internal agency staff level and capabilities; <br />- <br />Level of public involvement anticipated at the state and MPO level; <br />- <br />Tool development costs, including modeling and modeling expertise. <br />As indicated earlier, the Task Force envisions three phases to this work. The first phase is <br />premised on what can be accomplished this biennium with existing resources at both the <br />MPO and state level. However, consistent with HB 2001 Section 38a, ODOT and DLCD <br />will need to provide additional resources to conduct a pilot demonstration of scenario <br />planning for the Central Lane MPO. <br />Additional resources will be needed in the later phases of implementing the <br />recommendations of the Task Force. A thorough assessment of fiscal and other resources <br />needed to carry out the objectives of GHG reduction, including the tools, timing, expertise, <br />data, and financial considerations for state agencies and the six MPOs, should be conducted – <br />Resource needs assessment for DLCD, ODOT, DEQ, and other involved state <br />agencies. <br />Resource needs assessment for each MPO, including modeling, data, public <br />involvement, staffing, training, and professional expertise. <br />Cities and counties also might need additional resources for their role in implementing GHG <br />reduction plans. <br />The Task Force recognizes that the accomplishments of each MPO will vary based on their <br />individual resources, staff capacity, and other ongoing planning responsibilities. In addition, <br />assessing resource needs for MPOs will depend on the compatibility of the state requirements <br />with both current and future federal transportation requirements. Planning activities that <br />meet both federal and state rules may be funded with MPOs allocation of federal dollars. <br />Planning activities that are not compatible should be considered unfunded and additional <br />revenue sources will need to be identified. <br />As illustrated in Figure 4, Phases of State Planning to Reduce GHG Emissions, the early <br />sequence is the development of (1) GHG Toolkit, (2) GHG model development, (3) Best <br />Page 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.