Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />discussion. Ms. Jerome added that staff was talking to the State to determine if a promise to do something <br />could impact the numbers. She said that based on her reading of the law, the answer was probably not, but <br />she had questions based on her observations of other jurisdictions. <br /> <br /> <br />VI. ITEMS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF <br /> <br /> A. Other Items from Staff <br /> <br /> Ms. Gardner had no items. <br /> <br /> B. Other Items from Commission <br /> <br />Mr. Mills provided an update on the work of the Historic Review Board, noting that members had expressed <br />concern about the lack of meetings and the potential a listening session would be scheduled. He offered to <br />share those communications. <br /> <br />Ms. Bierle thanked Mr. Brown for attending the meeting and encouraged commissioners to be in touch with <br />their councilor ‘buddies.’ <br /> <br />Ms. Bierle said that the chairs of the Sustainability Commission and Planning Commission met to discuss <br />how the two commissions could work together in the public process for Envision Eugene and about a <br />working group to investigate the triple bottom line tool. Mr. Belcher asked about the committee to be <br />formed to examine the EmX process. Ms. Bierle said that work on that was in process. <br /> <br />Ms. Harding announced a commission opening on the UO/City of Eugene Liaison Committee. <br />. <br />The meeting adjourned at 1:30 p.m. <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene Planning Commission March 29, 2010 Page 8 <br />