My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: Ordinance on Downtown Urban Renewal Plan Amendment
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 05/10/10 Work Session
>
Item C: Ordinance on Downtown Urban Renewal Plan Amendment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:24:20 AM
Creation date
5/5/2010 3:55:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/10/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
176
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
th <br />2. Include for the proposed downtown Lane Community College development at 10 and <br />Charnelton $8 million as part of a proposed urban renewal plan amendment, local option levy, <br />and general obligation bond, a portion of which can facilitate a public plaza or open space area <br />at that site and potentially a downtown public safety substation. (Passed 6:2 Brown, Taylor <br />opposed) <br /> <br />3. Include as part of a proposed urban plan amendment, local option levy, and general obligation <br />bond, an additional $500,000 for improvements to the Parks Blocks to enhance that area for the <br />Farmers’ Market. (Passed 5:3 Brown, Solomon, Taylor opposed) <br /> <br />4. If the VA pursues PeaceHealth’s Willamette Street site for a new VA Clinic, include the VA Clinic <br />as part of a proposed urban renewal plan amendment, local option levy, and general obligation <br />bond. (Passed 6:2 Brown, Taylor opposed) <br /> <br />5. Pursue additional grant opportunities for steam conversion and electric vehicle charging <br />stations. (Passed 8:0) <br /> <br />6. To look for all other possible sources of funding for the LCC project, aside from a GO bond or <br />levy and excluding the use of Facility Reserves, and including the Urban Renewal funds we <br />currently have. (Passed 7:1 Brown opposed) <br /> <br />February 10, 2010: Council reviewed the City Manager’s recommendation for downtown projects <br />and funding options. Council adopted three motions prior to postponing the remainder of the <br />discussion to February 22. <br />1. a. Use $100,000 of one-time existing urban renewal dollars to purchase and install additional <br />lighting downtown and $100,000 of one-time dollars (½ from telecomm and ½ from existing <br />urban renewal) to purchase automated behavior crime reporting software and cameras, but <br />only after the Council approves the Manager’s plan for number, location, use and on-going costs <br />of the cameras, after considering the cameras expected effectiveness in deterring crime. <br />(passed 8:0) <br />1. b. Pursue use of Springfield jail beds to include the exchange for Springfield’s use of Eugene Fire’s <br />Training Center. (Passed 5:3 Brown, Taylor, Zelenka opposed) <br />1. c. Include in the Manager’s proposed FY11 budget $500,000 of the City’s HSC contribution for <br />partial funding of the downtown safety initiative, including additional services like Cahoots. <br />(passed 8:0) <br />Moved to postpone (Passed 6:2 Brown, Taylor opposed) <br /> <br />January 11, 2010: Council reviewed funding options and discussed connections between options and <br />seven specific projects. <br /> <br />December 14, 2009: Council reviewed eight specific projects to implement the four strategies for <br />downtown revitalization. <br /> <br />October 21, 2009: Council approved continuing downtown discussions according to a set <br />revitalization process and requested staff to return with specific projects and potential tools to <br />implement four strategies for downtown revitalization. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.