Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ATTACHMENT E <br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />Public Hearing/Work Session <br />Council Chamber <br />777 Pearl Street—Eugene, Oregon <br /> April 19, 2010 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Mike Clark, Betty Taylor, George Poling, George Brown, Alan Zelenka, <br />Jennifer Solomon, Andrea Ortiz. <br /> <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br />1. PUBLIC HEARING <br />An Ordinance Adopting an Amended Urban Renewal Plan for the Downtown Urban Renewal <br />District <br /> <br />City Manager Jon Ruiz provided an overview of the proposed Downtown Urban Renewal Plan amendment and <br />four targeted downtown projects. He said the amendment for the four proposed projects only would increase <br />the plan’s spending limit by $16.1 million, expand the boundary if the Veterans’ Administration (VA) chose a <br />downtown site for its clinic, impose a sunset provision and establish an annual review panel. He said the <br />council was scheduled to review comments from the public, Planning Commission and taxing districts at its <br />May 10, 2010, work session, with action on the amendment scheduled for May 24. He noted that a frequently <br />raised concern was the impact of the urban renewal district on School District 4J and stated that an analysis by <br />the county assessor, in which the school district concurred, concluded that the school district was better off <br />financially if the downtown urban renewal district continued. Specifically, the school district would lose <br />$117,000 annually if the district was terminated. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing and recited the procedures for providing testimony. <br /> <br />Sue Prichard <br />, Emerald Street, Eugene, Ward 3, said she was a semi-retired real estate broker and much of her <br />professional activities had focused on the leasing and sales of downtown properties. She thanked the council <br />for its commitment to downtown and developing a sensible, comprehensive plan. She said the past had proved <br />that no one project was the solution for downtown; it was a complex puzzle that required a number of <br />simultaneous activities in the public and private sectors and a continued commitment over time. She strongly <br />supported a favorable vote to amend the urban renewal plan as proposed. It was a timely step forward and <br />without it time would pass and nothing would change. She said tax increment financing was an effective tool <br />and one of the few available to the City for downtown revitalization. She said all of the projects were <br />important and well thought-out, particularly construction of a Lane Community College (LCC) campus <br />downtown. Her life had been changed by the opportunity to attend LCC and there were thousands of similar <br />stories in the community. <br /> <br />Ben Sappington <br />, Mecca Avenue, Eugene, Ward 5, stressed the need for a thriving downtown and its <br />importance to the economic well-being of the community and retention of young, talented workers central to <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 19, 2010 Page 1 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />