Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Jim Welsh <br />, Centennial Plaza, Eugene, speaking for the Eugene Association of Realtors, said realtors were <br />supportive of efforts to revitalize downtown and expressed their gratitude to the council for its continued <br />interest in and attention to downtown. He said there had been disappointments, but the City could not give up. <br />He said worthy projects had been proposed and tax increment financing would help them move forward and <br />pave the way for future growth, including growth that would increase tax payments. He was pleased that <br />public safety was a part of the proposal and urged the council to approve the plan. <br /> <br />Richard York <br />, University Street, Eugene, Ward 2, spoke in favor of the urban renewal plan amendment, <br />which he felt was very carefully designed. The four projects were well thought out and provided vital public <br />services that would improve the quality of life in the community, particularly the LCC campus that would <br />make it much easier for people to access educational opportunities. He urged the council to support the <br />amendment. <br /> <br />Kappy Eaton <br />, Covey Lane, Eugene, speaking on behalf of the League of Women Voters of Lane County, said <br />the league supported the proposed amendments to the downtown urban renewal plan and favored increasing <br />the spending limit and expanding the boundary. She said the four projects included in the amendment would <br />contribute to the plan goals of strengthening economic conditions in the plan area, as well as enhancing <br />downtown’s role as a center for public and private development and investment. She said tax increment <br />financing was a reasonable method to raise revenue for such activities, which would support other activities <br />planned or underway downtown. She spoke to the benefits of each of the four projects and urged the council <br />to support the plan amendment. She said the league was not advocating for a referral of the plan amendment <br />to voters, it would not be inappropriate given the expansion of maximum indebtedness and geographic <br />boundary of the district. <br /> <br />th <br />Phil Farrington <br />, East 11 Avenue, Eugene, Ward 1, representing PeaceHealth as its director of land use <br />planning and development, said that PeaceHealth had been actively working with the VA to bring a new <br />outpatient clinic of approximately 120,000 square feet into the area. He said the project would bring hundreds <br />of family-wage jobs and provide services to thousands of veterans in the community and surrounding areas. <br />He said the Willamette Street site was a strong candidate for the facility based on a number of factors and the <br />City’s ability to exercise its available tools to assist redevelopment on the site increased its viability. He said <br />that while the VA had not yet made a decision, the financing tool gave the downtown site an advantage that <br />could prove decisive. He urged the council to support the proposal. <br /> <br />Joy Marshall <br />, Eugene, Ward 2, spoke in favor of the proposal for use of urban renewal funds, particularly the <br />LCC project. She had been a strong advocate for school funding for the past decade and was distressed with <br />use of the school funding argument to oppose the urban renewal plan amendment. She agreed there was a <br />small amount of property tax funds diverted from the school district by urban renewal, but the State <br />compensated for most of that loss. She noted that property tax funds were also used for many City functions <br />such as fire, police and administration. She said the real question was whether the proposal was a reasonable, <br />moderate and carefully designed proposal that was important to the community, and she felt it was. She urged <br />people not to use a misguided argument against the urban renewal plan amendment because it would provide <br />far more benefit to the community than harm. She said waiting for a better funding mechanism could result in <br />loss of opportunity and public trust. She urged the council to support the amendment. <br /> <br />Zachary Vishanoff <br />, Eugene, Ward 3, commented that the public had trust problems with urban renewal and <br />LCC could inherit those problems if it used urban renewal funds. He recommended separating LCC from the <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 19, 2010 Page 5 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />