Laserfiche WebLink
Attachment B <br /> <br />Issues Not Proposed for Inclusion in Scope – Current tasks (if any) and tasks that could be performed if <br />issue were added to scope <br /> <br />14.Parcel-Specific Plan Designations - Make the Metro Plan parcel specific with respect to plan <br /> <br />designations in all cases. <br />? <br />Parcel specific designations will be required for any new lands added to the UGB, any lands re- <br /> <br />designated, and any lands included on the buildable lands inventory (currently scoped) <br />? <br />All properties along the border of at least two designations would need to be individually <br /> <br />analyzed to determine appropriate designation. Analysis would include land use application <br />history, consistency with refinement plans and policies, and existing use. <br />? <br />Public notice to affected property owners and nearby properties <br /> <br />? <br />Seek public comment through workshops or other public meetings <br /> <br />? <br />Formal adoption process, including Planning Commission and City Council public hearings <br /> <br /> <br />15.Zone/Plan Designation Consistency - Resolve zoning and plan designation maps conflicts by rezoning <br /> <br />properties to make them consistent with plan designations. <br />? <br />Individually analyze all properties not currently zoned consistent with designation, and <br /> <br />determine appropriate designation. Analysis would include land use application history, <br />consistency with refinement plans and policies, and existing use. <br />? <br />Hire consultant to conduct analysis for consistency with state’s transportation planning rule <br /> <br />? <br />Coordinate with ODOT and Lane County on transportation analysis <br /> <br />? <br />Prepare findings addressing consistency with statewide planning goals, Metro Plan and other <br /> <br />applicable land use plans/policies <br />? <br />Seek public comment through workshops or other public meetings <br /> <br />? <br />Public notice to affected property owners and nearby properties <br /> <br />? <br />Formal adoption process, including Planning Commission and City Council public hearings <br /> <br /> <br />16.Dynamic Modeling of Residential Redevelopment - Model redevelopment as a function of other <br /> <br />factors (e.g., land availability, land cost). Ensure that the redevelopment rate is in response to <br />market realities of land availability. <br />? <br />Generally assess that redevelopment assumptions are realistic given various assumptions and <br /> <br />preferred alternative for UGB location (currently scoped) <br />? <br /> Postpone EE process until City purchases and initializes new software program or until LCOG <br /> <br />modeling program currently under development is available (anticipated for 2012) <br /> <br />17.Further Natural Resource Protections - Incorporate the South Ridgeline Habitat Study findings (un- <br /> <br />adopted), and any new Goal 5 or other resource protections desired by the community (wetlands, <br />drainageways, 25-year floodplains). <br />? <br />Goal 5 analysis is required for any UGB expansion areas and is already scoped (currently scoped) <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />