Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Attachment B <br /> <br />Specific Tasks for Issues Proposed for Inclusion in Envision Eugene <br /> <br />A series of issues have been raised in various forums in recent months for consideration in the Envision <br />Eugene scope of work. This document provides a summary of the tasks that would be included in the <br />project scope if the City Manager’s recommendation is approved. It also includes a list of the tasks that <br />would be needed if issues not currently recommended were added to the scope. It is important to note <br />that this is not a complete scope of work for the Envision Eugene project as it only references issues that <br />have been raised recently for consideration. Many additional items required by law are already scoped <br />as part of the project and are not listed here. The issues referenced below correspond to the issues and <br />identifying numbers in Attachment A. <br /> <br />Issues Proposed for Inclusion in Scope – Tasks that will be performed under the recommended scope <br /> <br />1.Transportation Findings - Make findings addressing state transportation rules for any specific parcels <br /> <br />that are redesignated, for new regulations that may increase density, and for any expansion areas. <br />? <br />Hire consultant to analyze and evaluate impact of actions on transportation facilities, based on <br /> <br />state’s transportation planning rule, and suggest possible mitigations (such as street or <br />intersection improvements, or reductions in allowed levels of service) for any significantly <br />affected facilities <br />? <br />For any significantly impacted transportation facilities, coordinate with ODOT and Lane County <br /> <br />to come to agreement on preferred mitigation <br />? <br />Mitigations may require addition of projects to TransPlan, or changes to adopted policies <br /> <br /> <br />2.Nodal Development - Examine nodal development/mixed use as a key land use efficiency strategy. <br /> <br />? <br />Determine analysis needed for a nodal development/ mixed use strategy to be quantified as a <br /> <br />land use efficiency strategy <br />? <br />Determine if state requirements for quantifying can reasonably be met within timeline and <br /> <br />budget, and if so, for how many sites <br />? <br />Quantify density efficiencies for the applicable sites or quantify a reasonable density efficiency <br /> <br />range that can be assumed for future sites <br /> <br />3.Housing Mix/Affordability - Examine needed housing mix (percentage of dwellings needed for <br /> <br />single-family versus for multi-family) with affordability as a factor. Coordinate with Community <br />Development, Housing Policy Board (HPB) and Equity/Human Rights. <br />? <br />Adjust assumed housing mix based on previous ECLA work on potential variations to the ECLA <br /> <br />assumptions <br />? <br />Meet with Community Development, HPB, Equity/Human Rights to determine appropriate mix <br /> <br />for housing affordability <br />? <br />Adjust assumed housing mix based on meetings <br /> <br />? <br />Consult same group on potential efficiency strategies and development patterns regarding their <br /> <br />impacts on housing affordability <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />