Laserfiche WebLink
oversight she perceived the Police Commission as having, giving way to lack of trust <br />from the community. <br />4. Next Steps on Taser Review Process <br />Mr. Alsup opened the floor for members of the committee to respond to the public <br />comments. <br />Juan Carlos Valle <br /> thanked the speakers for their input. He expressed his support for <br />recommendations put forth by the ACLU and said he wanted to help the Police <br />Department to improve their relations with the community. He wanted to make sure that <br />police officers thoroughly understood the impact of Tasers on individuals, and also to <br />ensure that officers were appropriately protected from harm in their work. He <br />commented that there was still time for community members to submit questions to the <br />Police Commission and City Council. <br />Tamara Miller <br /> thanked the attending community members participating in tonight’s <br />forum, and also during earlier forums. She also thanked Police Department members for <br />their ongoing aid to the committee. <br />Joe Alsup <br />remarked that when he had applied to work with the Police Commission four <br />and half years earlier, officers had no alternatives to using deadly force. He had seen the <br />need for better options, especially in cases of people experiencing a mental health crisis. <br />He had also hoped to see crisis intervention training implemented, which was begun in <br />the past few years and had become mandatory for all officers to receive. He commented <br />that he viewed the Taser as a serious weapon, yet felt it was superior to the use of a blunt <br />instrument with which to strike someone on the head. <br />Marilyn Nelson <br /> also thanked community members for their comments, and noted that <br />the many comments around accountability would also be appropriate for further work of <br />this committee around use of force policies. <br />With extra time in the agenda, Mr. Alsup then passed the microphone to several <br />anonymous people in the audience. <br />One commenter noted that Tasers had been over-marketed, and he felt its use had been <br />rushed into police work. <br />Another comment noted that it was a year ago this month that Ryan Salisbury had died <br />and that it had been said that if Tasers had been available to police officers then, Ryan <br />would still be alive. <br />A further comment noted that for public use of Tasers there was no training or permit <br />required. This person felt that Tasers should be defined as deadly weapons and be <br />banned for public use. <br />MINUTES—Eugene Police Commission May 4, 2010 Page 6 <br />Use of Force Committee – Taser Public Forum <br /> <br />