My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: City Council Process Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 06/16/10 Work Session
>
Item A: City Council Process Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2010 2:23:13 PM
Creation date
6/11/2010 12:42:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/16/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />11. Status of Positions on Bills until Final Ratification by the City Council <br />Time demands in the Legislature may not allow for each bill on which the IGR Committee takes a <br />position to be fully vetted by the full City Council before some type of action on the bill needs to <br />occur. <br /> <br />If a position the IGR Committee has taken on a bill is not unanimous, the position on that bill will <br />be neutral until the full City Council weighs in and directs a position. The bill will then be placed <br />on the next available City Council agenda. <br /> <br />Although any bill that has been reviewed by the IGR Committee may be pulled for discussion at <br />the request of any councilor or the Mayor at the City Council meeting, as a matter of practice and <br />courtesy to the members of the Council who do not sit on the IGR Committee, any bill on which <br />the IGR Committee is not in unanimous agreement will be specifically noted. <br /> <br />The City Council can modify the position taken by the IGR Committee on a bill; the final direction <br />to staff on any bill comes from the City Council. <br /> <br />12. Process for Federal Lobbying Efforts <br />The IGR Committee and IGR staff address Federal lobbying priorities in concert with a number of <br />the City’s local governmental partners. <br /> <br />The Federal priorities begin with a review of opportunities for funding in the next Federal budget <br />and goals that are specific to Eugene or the area. The IGR Committee meets and reviews the list <br />of potential priority projects. Potential projects should be those projects which have already gone <br />through the proper authorization channels and are “shovel ready” projects. Once the IGR <br />Committee reviews the list of potential projects, the Committee develops a list of project goals <br />that are considered to be achievable. <br /> <br />After the proposed goals have been vetted by staff, United Front partners, and other community <br />partners, and the IGR Committee, the priorities list is then presented to the full City Council for <br />review and approval. <br /> <br />The final list becomes part of the “United Front” agenda which is presented to the area’s <br />congressional representatives, executive department staff, and other potential funding sources in <br />Washington, D.C. The attendees on the lobbying trips typically include the Mayor, chair of the <br />IGR Committee, and appropriate City staff. <br /> <br />13. Grants and Funding Applications <br />The IGR Committee acts on staff recommendations for grant and other funding applications from <br />outside agencies such as governmental or private entities. This process is intended to help avoid <br />situations in which City departments may inadvertently be competing with each other for funding, <br />and to allow the IGR Committee and City Council to review staff plans for expenditures of grant <br />funds. <br /> <br /> <br />City staff interested in seeking funding prepares a written overview of the funding application for <br /> <br />Eugene City Council Operating Agreements – February 25, 2008 <br />Page 16 of 19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.