My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2: Metro Plan Work Plan Report
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 06/17/10 Joint Elected Officials
>
Item 2: Metro Plan Work Plan Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/11/2010 2:23:11 PM
Creation date
6/11/2010 1:03:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/17/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />ATTACHMENT B <br /> <br /> <br />METRO PLAN WORK PLAN ISSUES DIAGRAM May 18, 2010 <br /> <br />Springfield, Lane County and Eugene staff are 80% complete with conceptual/draft language proposals amending the Metro Plan and addressing the JEO recommendations (Box I). <br />Staff is asking the JEO to support amendments to the Metro Plan that include the JEO recommendations, HB 3337 conforming language and housekeeping edits, all of which are <br />necessary but cannot be accomplished independent of the other as noted below. <br /> <br /> <br />WORK TASKS ADOPTION OF METRO PLAN AMENDMENTS <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />JEO RECOMMENDATIONS: <br /> <br />a.Overarching policies that identify and address <br /> <br /> <br />regional issues. <br /> <br />b.Policies that allow for individual refinement plans for <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene and Springfield to address jurisdiction <br />Adoption/co-adoption of amendments <br />by EUGENE, SPRINGFIELD and <br />specific issues. <br /> <br />LANE COUNTY <br />c.Adjustments to the Metro Plan boundary and text to <br /> <br /> <br />address jurisdictional issues arising in the <br /> <br />urbanizable area and the area outside the urban <br /> <br />growth boundary. <br /> <br />A dispute resolution process that reflects the <br />d. <br /> <br /> <br />changes described in a – c. <br /> <br /> <br />e. <br /> <br /> <br />HB 3337 implementation: <br /> <br />? <br />Springfield HB 3337: SPRINGFIELD and <br /> <br /> <br />LANE COUNTY co-adopt (no Eugene) <br /> <br />II. <br /> <br />Eugene HB 3337: EUGENE and LANE <br />? <br />FINAL METRO PLAN <br /> <br /> <br />COUNTY co-adopt (no Springfield) <br />HB 3337 implementation and conforming language <br /> <br /> <br />REVISIONS <br /> <br /> <br />Conforming language: <br /> <br /> <br />Adoption/co-adoption of amendments by <br />? <br /> <br /> <br />EUGENE, SPRINGFIELD and LANE <br /> <br />COUNTY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />III. <br /> <br />Adoption/co-adoption of amendments <br />HOUSEKEEPING EDITS (i.e., Lane County Local <br /> <br />by EUGENE, SPRINGFIELD and <br />Government Boundary Commission, Growth <br /> <br />LANE COUNTY <br />Management) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />LCOG: L:\CITY COUNTY PLANNING\METRO\JEO\JEO MTGS 2010\JEO MTG 6-17-10\JEO AIS 6-17-10_V3.DOC Last Saved: June 10, 2010 <br />Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.