My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/08/10 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2010
>
CC Minutes - 02/08/10 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 12:51:13 PM
Creation date
6/14/2010 11:00:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/8/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />Eugene City Council <br />Regular Meeting <br />Council Chamber Eugene City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street Eugene, Oregon <br />February S, 2010 <br />7:30 p.m. <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Chris Pryor, George Brown, Andrea Ortiz, George Poling, Mike Clark, Betty <br />Taylor, Jennifer Solomon, Alan Zelenka. <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the meeting of the Eugene City Council to order. <br />1. PUBLIC FORUM <br />Mayor Piercy reviewed the rules of the Public Forum. <br />Mat Beecher, 1 331 Acorn Park Street, Councilor Pryor's Ward, spoke as a representative of the Human Rights <br />Commission (HRC). He read a letter, submitted to the council, into the record. The letter strongly urged the City <br />to issue a statement that underscored that the University of Oregon students from China that had been involved in <br />the recent Tasing incident were not at fault. The letter also commended the actions Chief Pete Kerns had taken to <br />reach out and make amends. He recommended that the. incident be used to improve cultural competency. <br />Eli Volem, 2695 Madison Street, said he worked for Earth Advantage Institute and he was testifying in regard to <br />the Multiple Unit Property Tax Exemption (MUPTE) that was before the council. He explained that Earth <br />Advantage Institute was a non -- profit provider and verifier for several green building programs. _ He said the <br />institute had been working with the project team to "pave the way" to achieve Leading in Energy and <br />Environmental Design (LEED) certification. He stated that he was present to validate the fact that the project was <br />well on its way to LEED certification. He noted that his role would be as a LEED green rater for the building, <br />which was unique to the "LEED for homes" rating system in that the person physically attended the site throughout <br />development to ascertain that green building measures were being employed. He underscored that there were <br />added costs to building to LEED standards. He predicted that the building would meet LEED gold standards and <br />possibly platinum. He felt the building had the opportunity to be a landmark in Eugene. He said the northwest was <br />known by the rest of the country as a green building hub. He also noted that the project was using local designers, <br />energy analysts, and contractors. <br />Paul Dustrud, 30 West 17` Avenue, stated that he was also speaking on behalf of Dan Neal for the "hopefully" <br />LEED -- certified project. He said he was trying to help support the local economy by designing With wood, noting <br />that the project would be five stories of wood over one story of concrete. He listed some of the strong design <br />points, such as the unique system they would be utilizing for indoor air quality and the heat recovery systems. He <br />also noted that they had added a "30s retro look" and ,balconies that looked out at the Coburg hills. He asked that <br />the project be granted the MUPTE. <br />Dan Neal, 1361 Pearl Street, also spoke on behalf of the project that was applying for the MUPTE. He declared <br />that they could not build the project to LEED standards Without the exemption. He thought that approval of the <br />project would "resonate harmoniously" with the community. He asked them to approve the project not just <br />because it Would create jobs in the community, but because there were two visions for the property: the proposed <br />project or a possible fraternity. He noted that construction of the latter would mean the City would not generate <br />any tax revenue from it. He underscored that the property would generate approximately $80,000 in tax revenue <br />annually after ten years. He noted that it would also generate approximately $200,000 in Systems Development <br />MINUTES Eugene City Council February 8, 2010 Page I <br />Regular Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.