Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Manager Ruiz recalled that a revenue bond was included in the existing resources option. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy pointed out that the council had the ability to select any option. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown agreed that the letter from the Board of County Commissioners was full of misconceptions <br />about urban renewal, but he believed the City could hold the County harmless given how distressed the <br />County organization was. The City diverted $200,000 in revenues from the County every year because of <br />urban renewal and while that did not seem like much in the City budget, it was a lot of money for the <br />County. He said the County could use the money for whatever it wanted. He believed it was the County’s <br />money. Mr. Brown was opposed to the plan in any form but suggested it would be more popular with the <br />voting public if the City held the County harmless. He suggested that could be accomplished by <br />eliminating the element of the plan related to the VA site, which he termed an aspirational fantasy. <br /> <br />City Manager Ruiz clarified that in the absence of urban renewal, the County would have received <br />$150,000 in fiscal year 2010. Mr. Brown said he saw different figures every meeting. The amount of the <br />amendment had fluctuated since last summer. He had asked how much was left in the downtown district <br />and he heard $3.5 million once and $4.5 million another time. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka reviewed the letter from the Board of County Commissioners, which estimated the County’s <br />loss at $150,000, and said he would take the County’s word. He suggested that the question was one of <br />who the City held harmless. Holding the County harmless would harm the schools. He preferred to hold <br />the schools harmless. He was surprised at the notion of turning the Eugene Facilities Reserve into the LCC <br />Facilities Reserve, as suggested by Ms. Taylor. That seemed inappropriate to him. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka said the opponents of the proposal were suggesting that the Lake Oswego schools get better <br />funding rather than Eugene having the four projects. The proposal did not raise taxes, did not hurt the <br />schools, and achieved the four projects. He believed that the proposal gave the City a vision for downtown <br />with a funding mechanism that made sense. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz left the meeting. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor wanted to know the objection to placing the item on the ballot. City Manager Ruiz suggested <br />that was a council policy decision. He said that it was not up to him to decide. Ms. Taylor pointed out that <br />City Manager Ruiz made the recommendation that the issue not go on the ballot. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark suggested that framing the discussion as pitting the interest of the County against the interest of <br />the City was unfortunate. He believed that if one was to look at the issue from a broader point of view, <br />having a revitalized downtown LCC campus served all County residents, as did a safer downtown. If the <br />City was able to secure the VA Clinic downtown, it would serve veterans on a regional basis, and he <br />believed the community owed veterans that service. He pointed out the Farmers’ Market drew people from <br />around Lane County. He suggested the council keep a broader perspective in mind. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy added that the council was acutely aware of the County’s financial state because it affected <br />everyone profoundly. She believed the City had tried to be a good partner to the County in dozens of ways, <br />and the City had cooperated with creative solutions. She believed that all understood that they lived <br />together in the County and each jurisdiction’s problems affected the other. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—City Council May 10, 2010 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />