Laserfiche WebLink
said the City of Springfield had held a public hearing on the facility plan and project list on May 17 and had <br />adopted the plan on the same day and the Lane County Board of Commissioners held a work session on the <br />facilities plan and project list on May 19, a public hearing on June 9, and were scheduled to take action on <br />June 23. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruffler requested that the following be entered into the record: <br /> · A letter from Michael Kortinhoff, Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) manager, water <br /> quality permit section, addressed to the Lane County Board of Commissioners regarding the <br /> MWMC facilities plan; <br /> · A memorandum from MWMC member Susie Smith and himself to the Lane County Board of <br /> Commissioners on peak wastewater flows in response to the public hearing held before the <br /> commissioners; <br /> · A letter from Dave Jewett, attorney for the MWMC, Meg Kieran, attorney for the City of <br /> Springfield, and Jerome Lidz, City Attorney for Eugene, on the subject of MWMC processes, <br /> dated May 27, 2004; <br /> · A letter from Matt Noesan, project manager, and Mark Lazwell, of CH2M Hill, on the subject <br /> of MWMC systems development charge (SDC) methodology; <br /> · A memorandum from Ms. Smith and himself to the Mayor and City Council on the council as- <br /> signment response to request for information on MWMC public involvement notification activi- <br /> ties; <br /> · Examples of project allocations, MWMC SDC update prepared by CH2M Hill on June 14, <br /> 2004; <br /> · Typical costs for residents wastewater utility rate and SDC survey prepared by Eugene, Spring- <br /> field, and CH2M Hill;. <br /> · An email response from Mr. Jewett, MWMC legal counsel, to Roxie Cuellar, president of the <br /> Homebuilders Association of Lane County, providing answers to questions submitted by her; <br /> · The contractual agreement between the MWMC and CH2M Hill, consultant technical services <br /> to the update of the MWMC facilities plan and redesign work. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruffler noted that the Lane Board of County Commissioners held the record open until June 16 at 5 <br />p.m., and he encouraged the City Council to do the same. <br /> <br />Given the lack of time for staff to respond to questions, Councilor Kelly asked how council questions would <br />be addressed. Mr. Taylor suggested the councilors submit questions by email, with copies to all councilors, <br />and staff would answer the questions also providing copies to all councilors. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Anne Ballew, 225 5th Street, Springfield, chair of the MWMC, said there was a need for a new facilities <br />plan as it was 27 years old and the facility itself was 20 years old. The commission, made up of elected and <br />appointed citizens from the cities of Springfield and Eugene and from Lane County, saw a need to evaluate <br />the whole plan. She related that the commission's consultant, CH2M Hill, and staff had worked diligently to <br />produce the plan, designed to meet new national pollution discharge elimination system requirements. She <br />noted the new elements the facility was required to address, the ammonia, the temperature of effluent in the <br />warmer part of the year, and a status quo on discharged solid waste. Additionally, she said the plan had to <br />improve the ability to handle stream flow increases in wet weather periods and accommodate future <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 14, 2004 Page 11 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />