Laserfiche WebLink
The following table summarizes the main elements of the four options for a Civic Center develop- <br /> ment and related improvements. Site options for Civic Center development are included in <br /> Attachment C. A more detailed description of each of the project elements and costs is included in <br /> Attachment D. A comparison of each of these options with the Civic Center Vision design <br /> principles is included in Attachment E. <br /> <br /> Component Option A Option B Option C Option I) <br /> City Hall Building Full consolidation City Hall scenario, <br /> w/parking for 2020+ need <br /> Community Safety Base building w/parking, back-up 911 <br /> 2008 need 2018 need 2028 need 2020+ need <br />..... ........................................................... .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... <br /> Move property and forensics <br />..................................................................................................... ~!c~7(9[p~E...{~r~...~p.~.i.~...pps...[p...9~!r~.~!c~ .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. <br /> Civic Center Social service agency space and -- 15,000 sf 20,000 sf 20,000 sf <br /> <br />..................................................................................................... ~P[ql/~5~...~5!...~!~.rPP..!}P[?~Y...!Pt. ....................................................... :.r ............................................... ~ ................................................. ~ ..................................................... r: ........................... <br />..................................................................................................... }~EP~.E..?.C~Pr~!Y.PEd~Eg ......................................................................................... r.r ............................................... ................................................. ..................................................... :z ........................... <br /> Improve park blocks and make civic <br /> street improvements <br /> $28.2 $41.7 $51.2-51.5 $111.5 <br /> Total Project Cost million million million million <br /> <br /> It is possible to pay for a new Community Safety facility without any additional funding approved <br /> by the voters by using $28.2 million in internal funds. The project would meet current needs only, <br /> and would not include any of the Civic Center amenities at this time, although those additional <br /> elements could be pursued later. The council could ask voters to contribute to the project to <br /> increase the facility size and add some of the amenities, and/or to add replacement of City Hall. <br /> <br /> Five financing plan options are described in Attachment E. Options A through C1 and Option D <br /> use the maximum amount of internal cash to reduce or eliminate the additional contribution from <br /> the taxpayers. The internal funding consists of the Facility Reserve, limited tax bonds, deferred <br /> revenue from the Telecommunications Tax lawsuits, deferred revenues from right-of-way pay- <br /> ments in the General Fund, Urban Renewal Agency funds, sale of assets, interest earnings, and <br /> other miscellaneous sources. In options B through D, General Obligation ("GO.") bonds are used <br /> to enhance the facility and add amenities recommended by the Mayor's Committee. <br /> <br /> The use of the deferred revenue from the Telecommunications Tax lawsuit and from right-of-way <br /> payments in the General Fund carries some risk. Those funds are the subject of legal action and <br /> may need to be returned to the companies that paid the taxes. The City is in a good position to <br /> think that those funds will be available, however. If the lawsuits are unfavorable to the City, staff <br /> will need to return to the council with a back-up funding plan. In the interim, design could begin, <br /> but the City will not sign a construction contract until the funds are available. <br /> <br /> A summary of the financing plan options is set out in the following chart. The tax rate in Year 1 <br /> would range from $0.16/$1000 of AV to $0.88/$1000 of AV. The average taxpayer impact in Year <br /> 1 would range from $26 to $144. The tax rate and taxpayer cost would go down over time, with the <br /> 20-year average being less than the first year cost. The Budget Committee recently approved <br /> revised debt policies that set a limit on net direct debt of 1.0% of real market value. After issuance <br /> of the debt for this project, the City's net direct debt to real market value in FY10 would range from <br /> 0.3% to 0.6%, which is under the policy limits. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2004 Council Agendas\M040714\S040714A. doc <br /> <br /> <br />