My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A - Nov.2004 Bond Issue
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-07/21/04WS
>
Item A - Nov.2004 Bond Issue
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:57:15 PM
Creation date
7/15/2004 10:29:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/21/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For Options A through C1, Facility Reserve amounts are relied on beyond the end of the <br />construction date. This will mean that the City will have to enter into interfund loan agreements <br />in order to pay the construction costs and repay the loans when future Facility Reserve amounts <br />are available. <br /> <br />Telecommunications Funds: In December 2003, the Oregon Supreme Court ruled in favor of <br />the City affirming the City's right to collect the 2% telecommunications tax on non-local ex- <br />change revenue. In April, the City received roughly $9 million representing Qwest's interpre- <br />tation and calculation of payment of the tax and interest on revenues earned from July 1997 <br />through December 2003. This payment represents the last of the large expected past period pay- <br />ments/settlements of the telecommunications tax. After consulting with the City Attorney, <br />accountants and auditors, and based on Qwest's assertion that their payment is contingent on the <br />resolution of a separate legal challenge, recognition of this payment was also deferred until that <br />case is decided by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. Regardless of the Court's decision, the City <br />Attorney believes, however, that these funds will ultimately be available to the City. A decision <br />from the 9th Circuit is expected in the relatively near future. The City is also expecting about <br />$800,000 from Qwest during FY05. The total of these two amounts, $10.2 million, is included <br />in some of the financing plan options as a subsidy for the Civic Center Vision. <br /> <br />While past council direction has devoted funding from the telecommunications tax to telecom- <br />munications projects of community benefit, the settlement payments provide a unique oppor- <br />tunity to fund a large portion of the Civic Center vision. This large one-time resource is also <br />appropriately used for a high-priority capital project under the City's financial policies. The <br />figures shown in the financing options A through C 1 and D represent the deferred revenue <br />amounts plus the amount needed for telecommunications projects within the building. Option <br />C2 includes only the amount needed for telecommunications equipment and retains $10.2 <br />million for other uses. <br /> <br />Right-of-Way Revenues in the General Fund: The City has been the subject of legal challenges <br />to the imposition of right-of-way revenues in the General Fund. In addition, the City has been <br />performing audits on some of the payers of the right-of-way fees. The largest of these revenues <br />is related to the Qwest lawsuit. Qwest appealed the US District judge ruling favoring the City <br />and the 9th Circuit Court heard arguments in November 2003. Staff anticipates a ruling some <br />time in early FY05. Consistent with the City's practice of deferring recognition of contested <br />revenues, the City has deferred recognition of these revenues while awaiting the decision of the <br />court and potential additional appeals. There is some risk to relying on this resource for the <br />financing plan, however. Should the court or any future appeal be decided against the City, this <br />resource would not be available for this project and the City would have to develop an alternate <br />financing plan. <br /> <br />Urban RenewalAgency Funds: The City Council is currently considering amending the urban <br />renewal plan for the Downtown District in order to use tax increment funds for any project other <br />than the library. If those amendments are approved, the URA could contribute $750,000 toward <br />the purchase and demolition of the butterfly parking structure from the County for redevelop- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.