My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A - Nov.2004 Bond Issue
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-07/21/04WS
>
Item A - Nov.2004 Bond Issue
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:57:15 PM
Creation date
7/15/2004 10:29:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/21/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Operating and Maintenance Costs <br /> <br />Although not part of the plan for financing the capital costs, it is important to include the esti- <br />mated operating and maintenance costs for the new building. The preliminary estimate of the <br />ongoing O&M costs for a new Community Safety Building would equal $1.1 million to $1.7 <br />million, depending on the size. The City Hall is estimated to require about $3.0 million in annual <br />O&M costs. For Option D, with both new facilities, the combined annual O&M cost would be <br />almost $4 million. <br /> <br />About half of the O&M cost represents daily building custodial, energy and other out of pocket <br />costs for operating the building. The other half represents the longer-term preservation of the <br />building, which includes preventive maintenance funded by facility maintenance rates and build- <br />ing preservation projects funded from the General Fund capital budget. <br /> <br />In Options B or C, the social service agencies would pay lease costs equal to the O&M, so there <br />would be partial funding for the added cost. In Option D, where there is full City Hall consoli- <br />dation and redevelopment, there would be some existing lease and O&M payments that could be <br />applied towards reducing the operations and maintenance costs for the new facilities. It is esti- <br />mated that the City current contributes about one-half of the estimated O&M cost for the new <br />facility on existing O&M, lease payments, major maintenance and capital costs for the locations <br />that would be vacated when a new City Hall was opened. <br /> <br />Given the City's structural budget imbalance, there is no obvious source of funding for a new on- <br />going commitment of General Fund dollars of any net increase in O&M costs, however. If the <br />council decides to authorize construction of this project, and assuming no change in the health of <br />the General Fund, a future year budget process may have to reallocate existing General Fund <br />dollars to the net increase in O&M on this facility. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.