My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/22/10 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2010
>
CC Minutes - 02/22/10 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 12:52:21 PM
Creation date
7/29/2010 9:15:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/22/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />Eugene City Council <br />McNutt Room -- -City Hall 777 Pearl Street <br />Eugene, Oregon <br />February 22, 2010 <br />5:30 p.m. <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Mike Clark, Andrea Ortiz, Jennifer Solomon, Chris Pryor, George Poling, <br />George Brown, Alan Zelenka, Betty Taylor. <br />Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the work session of the Eugene City Council to order. She noted <br />that the meeting was a continuation of the council's February 10 work session on the City Manager's <br />recommendations for downtown projects and funding options. She reviewed the council's actions on <br />February 10, related to additional lighting, automated behavior crime reporting software and cameras, use <br />of Springfield jail beds and funding for the downtown safety initiative. <br />Regarding the remaining recommendations for downtown, City Manager Jon Ruiz drew the council's <br />attention to a handout that contained revisions to some of the proposed motions. The revisions were based <br />on the council's February 10 discussion and provided clarity, but did not change the content. <br />A, WORD SESSION: <br />Downtown Projects — Tools <br />Mr. Poling offered the revised language provided by the City Manager as friendly <br />amendments to the February 10, 2010, work session motions. Mr. Clark and Ms. <br />Taylor accepted the amendment. <br />Ms. Piercy explained that the February 10 motions still on the table would be considered separately and <br />she would read each motion prior to the council's deliberation and action. <br />Motion 1 _rl _ <br />I move to present to the Urban Renewal Agency Board for its review a proposed <br />amendment to the downtown urban renewal plan that would 1 ] restrict the use of <br />tax increment funds and increase the spending limit to pay for (i) the Broadway <br />Place Garage's debt, thereby freeing up funding for additional police officers for <br />downtown public safety and property crime reduction, and (ii) not more than <br />three other projects if their inclusion is approved by later motions spe ' <br />,.,., ^ +; % _ " � T . and 2) terminate the downtown urban renewal district as soon as <br />the projects are paid for or sufficient funds are collected to fund those projects. <br />In addition, present to the council, at the same time that the City Manager brings <br />forward a draft amendment to the urban renewal plan, an analysis of both a local <br />option levy and a general obligation bond, instead of tax increment financing, to <br />fund the specified projects. <br />Mr. Brown objected to a councilor calling the question at the February 10 work session and a majority of <br />members concurring. He did not feel the urban renewal plan should be amended because the timeline was <br />too short and several deadlines had already passed. He said it took 100 days to craft an urban renewal <br />MINUTES Eugene City Council February 22, 2010 Page 1 <br />Work Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.