My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 05/11/09 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2009
>
CC Minutes - 05/11/09 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 12:53:51 PM
Creation date
7/29/2010 9:56:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/11/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
accordance with EC 2.400(l), he filed an official complaint against Ms. Reynolds on April 10, 2009, in his <br />capacity as an Executive Board member of the EPEA on behalf of the EPEA President. He had been notified by <br />City Attorney Tenn Klein that the initial determination of the complaint was that it fell outside the scope of the <br />council's formal complaint process. He averred that Mr. Klein's conclusion was that the complaint involved an <br />allegation of misconduct but was not one that involved a violation of federal, state, or local laws. Because of this, <br />he said, the council, would not take further action under EC 2.400 through 2.412. He had been perplexed by this <br />finding and the council's lack of action. He asserted that the complaint dealt with retaliatory measures against the <br />EPEA president due to his union affiliation. He asked how they could know for a fact that no violation of the laws <br />had occurred without a formal and professional investigation into the evidence. He stated that the process had <br />apparently come to an end and he was now before the council in accordance with EC 2.400(2) which stated that <br />any complaints that do not allege a violation of law shall not be considered by the council as part of this process <br />but may be presented by a complainant- to the City Council at its Public Forum. He asked the council to please <br />consider his presentation as a formal complaint of an allegation of misconduct against interim Police Auditor, <br />Dawn Reynolds, under EC 2.400(2). He provided the specific complaint in writing. He thanked the council for its <br />time in dealing with the matter. <br />Michael Quillin, 2735 Kismet Way, Ward S, expressed dismay that the Police Chief had decided to adopt a taser <br />policy. He believed it was premature to make this decision without having consulted with the Police Commission <br />and the public at large. He opined that this was akin to the former chief s determination that no misconduct had <br />occurred when a protester.had been Lased while allegedly resisting arrest in 2008. He reiterated the invitation to <br />the town hall meeting on tasers. <br />Randy Prince, P.G. Box 927, requested that the City conduct a thorough review of zoning in light of new hazard <br />information that may have been received over the preceding ten years. He said the relevance of this had to do with <br />how they might acquire the Beverly property and what it might cost. He felt that it would also call to question how <br />legally defensible the siting of critical facilities might be if they were in flood zone areas that were not developable <br />before the dams had been constructed; dams, he asserted were now recognized to be ' seismically "under - <br />engineered." He believed the Goal 7 process was required for the City. He averred that "after some landslides <br />killed people in Oregon," the legislature revised Goal 7 so that when new hazard information came in, the zoning <br />was to be "looked at." He said Part B of the law included a description of how the state was supposed to collect <br />the information and then order counties to do things. He alleged that the state had never done this and the <br />Legislature had held hearings to find out why this was not happening. He.believed that if information was Known, <br />the City would be required to follow the goals in Part A. He asserted that the Beverly property was in a landslide <br />zone and, should be rezoned. <br />Zachary Vishanoff, Ward 3, said a public hearing on the "big G" on Autzen Stadium was being held at 1:00 p.m. <br />on May 13. He related that someone had challenged it, adding "more power to them." He opined that the `G' was <br />too big and was not legal. He appreciated that the hearing had been added to the Public Meetings Calendar. He <br />asked if Councilor Clark would be available on July 10 or July 17 to participate in a City Club discussion on the <br />possible use of the EWEB headquarters building as a City Hall. He indicated that he would welcome participation <br />from the other councilors or the Mayor as well. <br />Mayor'Piercy closed the Public Forum. <br />Councilor Ortiz thanked everyone for sharing their thoughts. She indicated that she had gone on a police ride- <br />along and had also participated in the Citizens Police Academy. She encouraged all of her colleagues to do the <br />same, adding that she wished the councilors could learn about all City services in the same way. <br />Councilor Clark agreed that North Eugene needed more parks. He said he also had participated in the citizen's <br />academy during his tenure on the Police Commission. He had gone on a ride -along but believed he should go on <br />another. Regarding Mr. Humphrey's official complaint, he asked the City Manager to suggest the next responsible <br />steps having heard the complaint based on the ordinance. <br />MINUTES Eugene City Council May 11, 2009 Page 2 <br />Regular Meeting <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.