Laserfiche WebLink
<br />recommendation to City Council. EPD staff needed additional time to prepare the activity report and, <br />due to the extended time required by the Police Commission to process other policy work, there will be <br />insufficient time to review the DPSZ activity report and receive public comment before the DPSZ <br />ordinance sunsets. <br /> <br />The council is being asked to extend the deadline for the Police Commission’s review of the DPSZ <br />report and recommendation to the City Council by 30 days, to October 13, 2010. Further, the council’s <br />passage of the new ordinance (Attachment A) will extend the sunset date of the DPSZ Ordinance by 150 <br />days to January 8, 2011. The date of the extension is suggested to allow time to process any amendments <br />to the ordinance if, after hearing the recommendation, the council asks for amendments. In addition, the <br />council break occurs in December, and the number of available meetings is typically somewhat limited. <br /> <br />Tasks Current Timeline Proposed Extension <br />Police Commission Review of Activity <br />Report, Public Comment, and September 13, 2010 October 13, 2010 <br />Recommendation to council <br />DPSZ Ordinance No. 20419 Sunset Date August 11, 2010 January 8, 2011 <br /> <br /> <br />The Police Commission has scheduled a public input process for September 1, 2010, to be held at the <br />Eugene Public Library. At this public meeting, the Police Commission plans to provide information <br />regarding the activity report and the opportunity for members of the public to comment on the <br />Downtown Public Safety Zone exclusion process. The report will be posted on the Police Commission <br />and Police Department web pages prior to the public meeting. Public announcements regarding the <br />report’s availability will also be provided by the Police Commission. <br /> <br />The civil exclusion process has been a small but important component in law enforcement’s efforts to <br />improve downtown Eugene’s disorder-related issues. Law enforcement partners working together to <br />improve downtown hope the civil exclusion process will be a long-term element of the comprehensive <br />strategies of the City’s Downtown Initiative. <br /> <br />The council heard from seven speakers at the July 29, 2010, public hearing, who were not supportive of <br />the exclusion zone or the proposed ordinance. These individual’s concerns included disapproval of <br />exclusionary zones, First Amendment rights, fear that homeless individuals and youth may be unfairly <br />targeted for exclusion, and general dissatisfaction with the timing of the activity report preparation and <br />review. Two members of the public spoke in favor of the proposed ordinance and expressed satisfaction <br />with the DPSZ. <br /> <br />The council is asked to take action on the new ordinance on August 9, 2010, so the Downtown Public <br />Safety Zone will continue without interruption. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />This topic relates to the Safe Community Vision: A community where people feel safe, valued, and <br />welcome. In addition, the topic relates to several of the City Council’s goals: The Homeless, <br />Sustainability, Downtown and Police Initiatives. The Park Rules currently provide an option of <br />Z:\CMO\2010 Council Agendas\M100809\S1008097.doc <br />