My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 9: Police Auditor Evaluation Framework
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2010
>
CC Agenda - 08/09/10 Meeting
>
Item 9: Police Auditor Evaluation Framework
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2010 11:45:42 AM
Creation date
8/6/2010 11:29:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
8/9/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT B <br />Police Auditor <br />Performance Appraisal Form <br /> <br /> <br />Employee Name Appraisal Date <br /> <br /> <br />Position Title Employment Date: <br /> <br />Reviewer Name Review Period <br /> <br /> <br /> Instructions <br /> <br />Using one of the three descriptors, rate the Auditor’s performance for each of the performance <br />elements. Place an X next to the rating that best describes your assessment of her performance. <br />If you choose not to rate one of the elements please state your reasons in the comment area. Use <br />the blank space on each page to give examples that support your ratings of the element. <br /> <br />Does Not Meet Expectations <br />Work at this level suggests serious performance problems. The employee must make substantial <br />improvement or be subject to appropriate disciplinary action, which may include termination. <br /> <br />Meets Expectations <br />Performance at this level is characterized by overall successful and satisfactory performance of <br />job duties. <br /> <br />Exceeds Expectations <br /> <br />Performance at this level is characterized by overall successful performance with special <br />contributions in a significant number of areas which add value beyond what would be considered <br />satisfactory performance. Examples include: innovative approaches to work; efficiency gains, <br />significant contributions to improvement of department practices, processes, work team or <br />community relationships. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 Auditor Evaluation by CRB <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.