Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br />Under the RZ Facility Bond approach, BMC would obtain a loan from a bank. That loan would be <br />secured by payments from BMC and other security that is required by BMC’s bank. Although the <br />specific mechanics of how this would occur need to be worked out, the City would layer a bond <br />structure over the bank loan in order to provide the tax-exempt interest rates. No City money would be <br />used for the transaction. The City would not be lending money to BMC; the City would not be taking <br />any financial risk by entering into this transaction on behalf of BMC. The City’s Recovery Zone bond <br />allocation has a limited duration, and the State of Oregon has indicated that it will pursue the City’s <br />allocation in September for another purpose if those allocations are not committed to local projects. <br />To utilize the program, the BMC project would need to close its bank loan and begin drawing funds by <br />the end of calendar year 2010. With these time constraints, the council is being asked to indicate its <br />general support for the project concept and Recovery Zone bond financing proposal so that the <br />necessary approvals can be considered in September. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Development of the Vacant Parcel addresses many goals for Eugene and downtown, including activity <br />in the core, employment, and sustainability. This project is supported by the Downtown Plan; Down- <br />town Code Amendments; West Broadway Advisory Committee Recommendations; Central Area <br />Transportation Study; Downtown Vision; City Council’s Downtown Collective Statements from <br />August 2009; Downtown Policing Action Plan Team Short-Term Public Safety Strategy <br />Recommendations 2004; Cultural Policy Review; Mayor’s 2004 Committee on Economic <br />Development; Growth Management Policies; Sustainable Business Initiative; and JEO’s regional <br />economic development principles. <br /> <br />The City’s debt policies set out provisions for the use of conduit financing, which is what BMC has <br />requested for this project. Under those policies (which are included as Attachment B), a project has to <br />meet certain criteria, including that the City not incur any moral or financial obligation from the <br />borrowing, and that the private party requesting the financing pays all of the costs of the borrowing. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />1.Direct the City Manager to bring back additional project details for consideration including: <br />a) Request for URA Board approval of the transfer of ownership of the vacant parcel from Beam to <br />BMC, along with the assignment of Beam’s development rights under Beam’s Purchase and Sale <br />Agreement; <br />b) A resolution designating a Recovery Zone which would provide BMC the opportunity to utilize <br />Recovery Zone Facility Bonds as a tool to lower interest rates on the project; and <br />c) A resolution authorizing the City to issue Recovery Zone Facility Bonds in support of BMC’s <br />bank financing. <br /> <br />2.Take no action. <br /> <br />CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION <br />The City Manager recommends that the council declare support for the BMC project and that the <br />following items be brought back for consideration: a) transfer of ownership of the vacant parcel from <br />Beam to BMC, along with the assignment of development rights under Beam’s Purchase and Sale <br />Agreement; b) a resolution designating a Recovery Zone which would provide BMC the opportunity to <br /> Z:\CMO\2010 Council Agendas\M100811\S100811A and att's A and B.doc <br />