My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 06/28/10 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2010
>
CC Minutes - 06/28/10 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/23/2012 11:46:32 AM
Creation date
8/17/2010 12:08:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/28/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
available. He had heard from some parties that selling water to the City of Veneta was in conflict with the City of <br />Eugene's GMP and unsustainable. He suggested if the City of Veneta were allowed to grow it might have an <br />increase in jobs and industry which would mean fewer people would be driving from Veneta to Eugene for <br />employment. He observed if the City of Eugene did not sell water to the City of Veneta, and the City of Veneta <br />acquired water rights by another means, another facility would be required to withdraw the water from the river, <br />which would not be very sustainable. He hoped the council would look at good data to determine the best <br />direction to proceed. <br />Mr. Zelenka said the council regularly made decisions that impacted other people which were not based on what <br />those other people would do. It was legitimate for the council to assess an action based on the City's principles <br />and policies, to ensure they were consistent. Every action had an economic, environmental and social aspect, <br />referred to as the triple bottom line. Every triple bottom line aspect and the impacts should be assessed to <br />determine the impact on the community. <br />Ms. Piercy asked if the council understood the triple bottom line impact of the sale of water rather than the City of <br />Veneta taking water from their ground water supply, which would impact nearby rivers. She did not want the <br />council's action to be interpreted that the Eugene City Council disregarded the City of Veneta's authority over its <br />community or disrespect of the community. She asserted all of the local communities had a responsibility for <br />regional planning. She saw the water sale issue as a regional and state responsibility for managing growth. <br />Mr. Clark, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to direct the City Manger to intervene in the <br />validation proceeding and argue that the City Charter grants to the council, rather than <br />EwEB, the authority to decide to sell water outside the City's limits. The motion passed <br />unanimously, 7:0. <br />The meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Sandra Stubbs <br />Deputy City Recorder <br />(Recorded by Linda Henry) <br />MINUTES Eugene City Council June 28, 2010 Page 5 <br />Work Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.