Laserfiche WebLink
MWMC MemorandUm re:process <br />May 21,2004 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Deiermining the scope of the needs, planning to address them and funding their cost is complex. <br />The HB^'s complaint about the processes employed by MWMC oversimplifies and misstates the' <br />rules that govern the processes. <br /> <br />MwMC 2004 Facilities Plan: <br /> <br />The MWMC 2004 Facilities Plan is a comprehensive 20-year facility plan that replaces the 208 <br />Plan. However, the 2004 Facilities Plan is the product of a long, multi-phased planning process <br />that has involved significant public involvement, including three citizen advisory committees. It is <br />an outgrowth of and combines and updates prior studies such as the 1997 Master Plan, the 1997 <br />Biosolids Management Plan, the 1997 Systems Development Charge Methodology Update, the <br />2001 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan, and the 2003 Management Plan for a Dedicated <br />Biosolids Land ^pplication Site. The previous plans were reviewed by MWMC, the public, and <br />the Governing Bodies and have provided the basis for the annual MWMC Capital Improvements <br />prOgram (CIP) since their adoption. Of the $144,000,000 in projects currently anticipated in the <br />2004 Facilities Plan, $100,000,000 in projects are carried forward from the pdor plans. MWMC <br />has proceeded to implement each of the projects and policies in the plans, which has been <br />reflected in each annual MWMC budget and CIP. <br /> <br />Several key planning considerations were factored into the completion of the 2004 Facilities <br />Plan. Among them was the implementation of recommendations from Citizen Advisory <br />Committees that represented diverse community interests, values and involvement and which <br />had been adopted by MWMC as plans and policies. The City Councils have also adopted the <br />Wet Weather Flow Management Plan. The 2004 Facilities Plan also needed to factor in new <br />regulatory limitations DEQ included in the Permit. This factor caused some modifications to the <br />type and phasing of already planned projects, and resulted in $44,000,000 in additional projects. <br />over twenty years. The 2004 Facilities Plan was adopted by MWMC on May 6, 2004 after a <br />number of public meetings and two public hearings. MWMC chose to refer it to the Governing <br />Bodies for concurrence pursuant to Section 3 of the IGA. <br /> <br />Land Use PlanninR: <br /> <br />The proposed upgrades t° the wastewater treatment facilities system are to be done at three <br />different locations including the Water Pollution Control Facility, the residuals site and the <br />beneficial reuse site as well as upgrades to pump stations serving the primary collection system <br />at three separate locations. Since the Metro Plan did not include wastewater among the list of <br />services to develop within the UGB and did not identifY the wastewater treatment facility system, <br />MWMC proposed a number of amendments to the Metro Plan to correct the omissions. In <br />addition, MWMC proposed a number of changes to the Public Facilities and Services Plan to <br />correct similar omissions and make this functional plan internally consistent with the Metro Plan. <br />Consistency was to be'achieved by inserting vadous tables and maps identifying the six overall <br />projects and showing their location as well as including a condition assessment for MWMC's <br />treatment and primary collection system. The proposed amendments to the Metro Plan and the <br />PFSP were submitted for consideration by the Governing Bodies' planning commissions and <br />subsequently by all three Governing Bodies as required by the Springfield Development Code, <br />the Eugene Code, and the Lane Code. That process is continuing with its attendant public <br /> <br /> 3-2 <br /> <br /> <br />