Laserfiche WebLink
<br />to serve airport and airport-related functions. Furthermore, extension of services for future <br />development to meet the demands outlined in the master plan update is wholly consistent with <br />the Metro Plan and prior City determinations. <br /> <br />In addition to the demonstration made through the above findings, an exception from Statewide <br />Planning Goal 11 is not necessary based upon OAR 660-012-0065(1) and (3)(n). As previously <br />described, these administrative rules preclude the need to take an exception to Goal 11 (and Goals <br />3, 4, and 14) if the proposed amendments do not permit service to a larger class of airplane. The <br />current master plan update does not include any amendments to land use designation or <br />proposed improvements through the planning horizon of 2026 that would permit service to a <br />larger class of aircraft than is currently provided. <br /> <br />As such, adoption of the current master plan update is consistent with Goal 11 and will not affect <br />Metro Plan compliance with the Goal. <br /> <br />Goal 12 - Transportation: To provide and encourage a safe, convenient and economic <br />transportation system. <br /> <br />Goal 12 is implemented through the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), as defined in Oregon <br />Administrative Rule OAR 660-012-0000, et seq. The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area <br />Transportation Plan (TransPlan) provides the regional policy framework through which the TPR is <br />implemented at the local level. The TPR states that when land use changes, including amendments <br />to acknowledged comprehensive plans, will significantly affect an existing or planned <br />transportation facility, the local government must put in place measures to assure that the <br />allowed land uses are consistent with the function, capacity and performance standards of those <br />transportation facilities. <br /> <br />As previously described, adoption of the current master plan update does not include any <br />amendments to the Metro Plan, adopted land use designations or existing zoning. No changes are <br />proposed to the functional classification of any roadways serving the airport. Adoption of the <br />updated refinement plan is not anticipated to reduce any existing transportation facilities below <br />accepted levels of service or otherwise significantly affect any transportation facilities as outlined <br />in the TPR. Unlike the prior adoption of amendments to implement the 1999 Airport Master Plan, <br />the current master plan does not include any new planned transportation facility projects or major <br />roadway realignments requiring formal plan amendments. <br /> <br />Consistent with OAR 660-012-0065(3)(n), the proposed airport improvements recommended in <br />the updated master plan do not permit service to a larger class of airplanes. As noted in Chapter 3 <br />(Section 2.2. Design Standards), the Eugene Airport will continue to accommodate the Boeing 737- <br />300 aircraft which has an FAA Airport Reference Code (ARC) of C-III. The current air carriers at the <br />Eugene Airport use smaller regional jet aircraft, and although not currently as common as in the <br />past, the Boeing 737 has long been used as the critical design aircraft. To the extent that future <br />airport improvements may result in additional motor vehicle traffic impacts, County traffic impact <br />analysis requirements will be addressed as development and permitting occurs. <br /> <br />As the current master plan update is consistent with OAR 660-012-0065 as well as other OARs <br />Findings – Eugene Airport Master Plan Update (RA 10-2 and PA 10-5284) Page 11 <br /> <br />