Item B: Animal Services - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Two very important issues that remain unresolved are recommendations to improve or replace the outdated shelter and spay/neuter facility, and the question of finding additional revenue for animal services. The current animal shelter, completed by the Tri-Agency in 1978, is co-owned by the cities of Eugene and Springfield and Lane County. The facility houses Lane County Animal Services and the City of Eugene Spay/Neuter Clinic. While the facility was considered state-of-the-art in 1978, it now is inadequate to current needs. In 2003 Lane County brought in an architectural consultant to conduct a needs assessment. The needs assessment recommended construction of a new 22,000 square foot shelter. The assessment was clear that “the goal of any renovation, expansion or new shelter should be to create a safe, efficient, and humane facility.” The report highlighted specific concern about ADA accessibility to the facility, as well as stating “the arrangement and flow of the existing facility does not allow for segregation of animal control functions and public access. This permits conflicts between dangerous animals and the public.” The report identified problems with parking, customer reception, and human/dog, dog/dog and dog/cat conflicts. The report addressed improvements needed to address adoptions, stray animals, animal holding areas, and animal handling and evaluation. Lane County then contracted with PIVOT Architecture to complete a master plan for LCAS. The Lane County Animal Services 2007-2008 Master Planning Study was delivered on March 5, 2008. This study described four options for improving the facility, ranging from a remodel and expansion of the existing facility, to a new expanded facility, or a remodel/expansion combined with a satellite outreach center. Cost estimate for these options ranged from $6.6 to $9.8 million. On April 7, 2010, the Lane County Board of Commissioners was provided a report, Animal Service Facility Options, on options for improvement or replacement of the shelter. This report was prepared by a workgroup that included Eugene, Springfield and Lane County representatives. The workgroup examined options for funding, structuring and operating a state-of-the-art facility to replace the existing facility. There was consensus among the workgroup participants that…  The current facility has outlived its useful life and needs to be replaced;  Time is of the essence;  There is a high level of community interest in issues relating to animal services; and  These conditions offer an opportunity of leveraging a solution. The workgroup reviewed a range of options for collaborative action among the three governments and local non-profit animal welfare organizations, foremost of which is Greenhill Humane Society. More than a dozen sheltering operations with facilities constructed within the last ten years were contacted to learn what collaborative structure they chose to use. Options for sharing construction costs and ownership were explored and three general options were described: first is an option to replace or remodel the facility through collaboration between the governments, second is an option to expand a collaborative approach to include a non-profit partner, and third is an option to do nothing. The report recommends that the facility be improved or replaced and these options be further developed by regional governmental partners. The primary unanswered questions identified in the report involve the degree of collaboration desired by the participating organizations, and the funding strategy for improvement or replacement of the facility.