Laserfiche WebLink
CHAPTER 5 <br />FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS <br />expenditures increased from $360,000 in FY 2003 to $503,000 in FY 2009. Based upon discussions with <br />Airport Management, Central Service Allocation costs are projected to increase more modestly between <br />FY2009 and FY 2016, increasing from $503,000 to approximately $618,627 or by 3.0 percent per year <br />during this period. <br />Aggregating operating expenses with non-operating expenses yields total annual expenditures incurred <br />by the Airport. As shown in Table 5-6, total Airport Operating Expenses increased from $5,336,935 in FY <br />2003 to $6,599,939 in FY 2009. Projected increases in the Airport’s total expenses are presented in <br />Table 5-7, which forecasts expenditure levels increasing from $6,699,939 in FY 2009 to approximately <br />$9,152,109 in FY 2016. <br />6. <br />Debt Service <br />Given the magnitude and scope of the projects contained in the recommended CIP, the issuance of new <br />debt will be necessary to underwrite the following elements of this work: <br />Terminal, Phase II – Airport Administration and Baggage project ($9.6 million PFC eligible as well as <br />$2.4 million for non AIP and PFC project components) <br />Concourse B Expansion ($1.9 million PFC revenues) <br />Concourse C – Phase I Expansion ($6.7 million PFC revenues) <br />Airport Access Road Improvements ($1.6 million PFC revenues) <br />Phase I – Passenger Parking Expansion Project ($2.2 million) <br />Since portions of the terminal construction projects are eligible for funding through the PFC program, it is <br />proposed that the Airport weigh the feasibility of pursuing debt financing backed by its future stream of <br />PFC revenues to retire this debt and complete this work in a timely fashion. Since the Airport successfully <br />retired all outstanding debt as of June 30, 2008 the Airport will be in an opportune position to issue new <br />debt to undertake these projects assuming passenger activity and operating financial results are achieved <br />and are reasonably expected to continue for the duration of the debt payment period. Several options <br />exist for the Airport to pursue debt financing for these projects including: <br />General Obligation Bonds issued by the City on behalf of the Airport with PFC revenue and general <br />airport revenue pledged to support payment of debt service <br />General Airport Revenue Bonds secured by a pledge of general airport and PFC revenue to retire <br />debt service <br />Stand-Alone PFC Bonds backed solely by PFC revenues <br />Each of the above options have unique advantages and disadvantages which the Airport should more <br />thoroughly and thoughtfully weigh prior to proceeding with issuing bonds for these projects. In terms of <br />the Passenger Parking Expansion and Airport Administration Projects, it is recommended that the Airport <br />issue either General Obligation Bonds or General Airport Revenue Bonds secured by a pledge of general <br />airport revenues for retirement of this debt. <br />5-26 <br />Eugene Airport Master Plan Update <br />(February 2010) <br /> <br />