Item C: Downtown Public Safety Zone Ordinance

Home Browse Search

¾»¸¿ª·±®¸¿ª»¾»»²±ª»®¬¿¬»¼òÍ¸»¿·¼¬¸¿¬¬¸»®»°±®¬¿§±ª»®êðû±º°»±°´»»¨½´«¼»¼®»°±®¬»¼¬¸»³»´ª» ¿¸±³»´»¾«¬¸»¬¸·²µ·¬·³«½¸³±®»ô½´±»®¬±èðûòÍ¸»¿¼¼»¼¬¸¿¬¬¸»»¨½´«·±²§¬»³·½±²º«·²¹¿²¼ ©¸»²ª·½¬·³±ºº»²¼¬¸»§ªÅ¸±©«°¾»½¿«»¬¸»§¸¿ª»¬±©±®µ±®£ªÅ«²¼»®¬¿²¼¬¸»°®±½»ò Î¿¬¸»®¬¸¿²»¨½´«¼»°»±°´»·²±²»²»·¹¸¾±®¸±±¼ô¸»«®¹»¼º±½«±²¬¸»²»»¼º±®»®ª·½»òÜ±©²¬±©²¸¿²± °«¾´·½¾¿¬¸®±±³¿²¼ª»®§º»©¹¿®¾¿¹»º¿½·´·¬·»òÒ±²±²¼»²±³·²¿¬·±²¿´¸»´¬»®¿®»¼±©²¬±©²òÓ±¬°»±°´» £ªÅ½¸±±»¬±¾»¸±³»´»ô¬¸»§¿®»¬¸»®»¾»½¿«»¬¸»§¿®»³»²¬¿´´§·´´òÉ¸»²´·ª·²¹±²¬¸»¬®»»¬ô§±«®´·º»· °«¾´·½òÐ±®¬´¿²¼¸¿¼¬¸»¿³»¬§°»±º»¨½´«·±²±®¼·²¿²½»ô¾«¬©¿«»¼º±®°®±º·´·²¹òÛ¨½´«¼·²¹°»±°´»º®±³ ¼±©²¬±©²°«¸»¿½¬·ª·¬§¬±±¬¸»®¿®»¿òÎ¿¬¸»®¬¸¿²»¨½´«¼»º®±³±²»¿®»¿ô»²º±®½»¬¸»´¿©¿ÃÅ©®·¬¬»²ò×º »²º±®½»³»²¬ÃªÅ©±®µ·²¹ô®»º»®°»±°´»¬±±¬¸»®»®ª·½»òÌ¸»°®±¾´»³·²½±«®¬¿°°»¿®¿²½»·¬¸¿¬·¬°«²·¸» ¬¸»ª·½¬·³¿©»´´òÉ¸¿¬·¬¸»®»¿´½¿«»±º±«®°®±¾´»³á É·´´·¿³Ó±µ¿´æ Ø»·¿Ê·»¬²¿³ª»¬òßº¬»®¾»·²¹¿¬¬¸»º±®«³ô¸»·³±®»·²º¿ª±®±º¬¸»»¨½´«·±²¦±²»òØ» ¿·¼ÛÐÜ²»»¼¬¸·¬±±´òØ»´·ª»·²¬¸»Þ«½µ´»§Ø±«»¿²¼·¬¹·ª»¸·³¿¿º»°´¿½»òØ»»»©¸¿¬µ·¼¸¿ª»¬± ¼»¿´©·¬¸ô¿²¼§±«²¹µ·¼¿®»¾»·²¹¬¿µ»²¿¼ª¿²¬¿¹»±ºòØ»¿·¼µ·¼¸±«´¼¾»·²½¸±±´¿²¼¬¸¿¬¸»µ²±© ³±¬±º¬¸»°±´·½»±ºº·½»®¿²¼»½«®·¬§°»±°´»òØ»½±²½´«¼»¼¬¸·±®¼·²¿²½»·¹±±¼ò Ý´¿·®»Í§®»¬¬º®±³¬¸»ßÝÔË³¿¼»¿º·²¿´½±³³»²¬æ Í¸»¿·¼¬¸¿¬©»¸¿ª»¸»¿®¼¿´±¬¿¾±«¬½®·³»¬±²·¹¸¬¿²¼ ¸»¾»´·»ª»¬¸»»½®·³»ªÅ«²·¯«»¬±Ü±©²¬±©²òÝ®·³»¸¿°°»²¿´´±ª»®¬¸»½·¬§òÍ»½¬·±²·²¹±ºº±²»¿®»¿ ¼±©²¬±©²_£ªÅº·¨¬¸»°®±¾´»³òÐ»±°´»½¿²¾»¸»´¼¿½½±«²¬¿¾´»º±®¬¸±»½®·³»©·¬¸¬¸»§¬»³©»¸¿ª»·² °´¿½»±°»±°´»ªÅ¼»²·»¼¼«»°®±½»©¸·´»¼»¿´·²¹©·¬¸½®·³·²¿´»´»³»²¬ò×º§±«¬¸·²µ§±«®°«¾´·½¿º»¬§ §¬»³·º¿·´·²¹ô¬¸»²¬»°«°¿²¼¼±±³»¬¸·²¹¬±«°°±®¬¬¸»¶¿·´¿²¼°«¾´·½»®ª·½»ô·²¬»¿¼±º¬¿µ·²¹¿¸±®¬ ½«¬¿²¼«·²¹¬¸»»¨½´«·±²±®¼·²¿²½»ò Minutes Recorded by Randi Zimmer, Police Commission Staff EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AT THE POLICE COMMISSION OFFICE: 1. Prepared Statement from Claire Syrett, ACLU Exclusion Zone Talking Points Police Commission Forum September 1, 2010 As a matter of policy the ACLU opposes programs like the one currently in place for downtown Eugene that allow pre-conviction exclusion of someone accused of a crime. Excluding a person from our public places – our commons – is a serious sanction that should not be imposed without due process of law. When we speak about excluding som eone under these zones we are talking about limiting someone's right to travel and associate freely in our society. To us, this right is a fundamental right. And before our government removes or limits that right by using an exclusion order, it must ensure that certain due process protections happen so that we do not end up punishing the innocent. These protections include: arrest and filing of criminal charges, the right to counsel, the right to a j udge or jury, a judicial hearing and judicial oversight. While the proponents of the exclusion zone focus on how effective and necessary this ordinance is we shouldn’t loose sight of what we are giving up to use this too l - including fundamental rights guaranteed by our Bill of Rights and a process that upholds those rights – rights which protect all of us in this room and in the businesses and schools downtown - not just those people who might be the targets of this ordinance. I want to be clear: the ACLU believes that we can have exclusion orders that uphold these due process principles. In stead of an ordinance, we can use the current judicial system. Under our system, if a person is suspected of one of the crimes included in the exclusion ordinance, they can be arrested or cited and then must appear before a judge. At that time, if the person is going to remain or be released from custody before going to trial, the District Attorney can request the judge to issue an exclusion order as part of the release conditions. And if the person pleads guilty or goes to trial and is found guilty then at the time of sentencing, the judge can order the person excluded as part of the sentence.