My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 01/11/11 Meeting
>
Item 3A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2011 2:26:06 PM
Creation date
1/7/2011 1:23:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ATTACHMENT A <br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />McNutt Room – City Hall <br />777 Pearl Street—Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br /> July 28, 2010 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Chris Pryor, George Brown, Andrea Ortiz, Betty Taylor, George Poling <br />(via telephone), Jennifer Solomon, Alan Zelenka. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS ABSENT: Mike Clark. <br /> <br /> <br />Her Honor Kitty Piercy called the work session meeting of the Eugene City Council to order and noted <br />that Councilor Mike Clark would not be in attendance. <br />WORK SESSION - Judicial Evaluation Committee Report <br />A. <br />Assistant City Manager Sarah Medary introduced City Court Administrator Jeff Perry and Judge Kip <br />Leonard to present the Judicial Evaluation Committee's report. She further noted that Municipal Judge <br />Wayne Allen would join the conversation after the committee presentation. <br />Judge Leonard reported that the Judicial Evaluation committee had reviewed court statistics and customer <br />surveys as part of its evaluation of Judge Allen. He further noted that the court had conducted two <br />judicial surveys; one survey of defense attorneys, prosecutors, interpreters, court advocates, police traffic <br />officers other judges and court staff, and one survey intended to collect information regarding human <br />rights needs in the community. He reported that while the first judicial survey had enjoyed a 26 percent <br />response rate, the second human rights community survey had had no responses. <br />Judge Leonard presented the survey results described in the committee's memorandum to Mayor Piercy <br />and the City Council, which had been included as part of the agenda item summary materials. He <br />commented that the questions in the survey had been developed in accordance with nationally recognized <br />guidelines for court administration and judicial reviews. <br />Judge Leonard noted that the committee had spoken with Judge Allen at its most recent meeting to hear <br />his observations on the past, present, and future of the Municipal Court. <br />Judge Leonard stated that the survey results had indicated very strong support among members of the <br />community for the work of Judge Allen; 85 percent of respondents had agreed or strongly agreed that <br />Judge Allen had performed his duties exceptionally. <br />Judge Leonard reported that Judge Allen had over the last four years retained the services of a number of <br />associate judges to serve on the Municipal Court. He noted that Judge Allen would provide further <br />information in that regard later in the work session. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 28, 2010 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.