My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 01/11/11 Meeting
>
Item 3A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2011 2:26:06 PM
Creation date
1/7/2011 1:23:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Solomon said the plan covered six areas that were inclusive of most areas the council addressed. She <br />asked if every future plan or decision would be filtered through the plan. City Manager Ruiz did not think <br />so. He suggested that the City Council would want to go through the triple bottom line analysis for many <br />decisions. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy hoped the plan encouraged the community to work together to move in certain directions, but <br />she pointed out the City could not force anyone to do something they did not want to do. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz thanked Mr. McRae and the commission for their work on the plan. She said the City could not <br />demand that people do the things called for in the plan, but the actions represented best practices if the <br />community wanted to do good things for the environment. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz suggested a tie between the plan and the fact that residents living along the Highway 99 corridor <br />lacked a place to buy fresh food and vegetables. Mr. McRae said that “20 minute neighborhoods” was <br />about that topic specifically, and was a topic of discussion through the Envision Eugene process. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark said he would support the proposed motion because it was worded to support the plan goals and <br />called for specific items to come back to the council for later discussion. He believed the essence of the <br />goals were around energy use and its costs and what the community should be prepared for. He said he <br />thought the community needed to be prepared. He did not think that people would be driving cars that <br />burned gas in 20 to 30 years because the cost of gas would be prohibitive and people would have alterna- <br />tives. It was smart to help people to transition to change. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor asked how the community would become aware of the plan. Mr. McRae anticipated that <br />education campaigns would be prepared for actions calling for consumer behavioral changes. City Manager <br />Ruiz anticipated that the City’s Web site would be employed to spread word of the plan and suggested that <br />those who participated in the development of the plan, including the Sustainability Commission, would be <br />ambassadors for the plan. He also thought the neighborhood associations could play a role in getting the <br />word out. Ms. Taylor encouraged the neighborhood organizations to schedule general meetings devoted to <br />the topic, and encouraged Sustainability Commissioners to attend those meetings. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy observed that many neighborhood organizations already had sustainability committees and <br />many association members participated in the plan’s creation. Ms. O’Sullivan reported that the Sustainabil- <br />ity Commission’s work plan included a task specific to outreach and messaging, and the commission was <br />actively seeking opportunities to network with the neighborhood associations and other community groups. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to direct the City Manager to implement actions <br />that support the Community Climate and Energy Action plan goals and objectives, subject <br />to best practices, resources, collaboration with community partners, and approval by coun- <br />cil of future policy changes. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka asked Ms. O’Sullivan about her perspective on the plan. Ms. O’Sullivan found the plan to be <br />on the cutting edge. It tried to achieve several objectives that were related but frequently missing in other <br />plans, such as the combined objectives of planning for climate change and adaptation and trying to reduce <br />greenhouse gas impacts by tying those issues directly to fossil fuel use. She thought the connection to public <br />health was another important innovation. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—City Council September 15, 2010 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.