Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Klein asked how the council would use the information. If the council wanted to be able to take that <br />information into account in deciding whether to give the manager a raise, staff needed to revise the process <br />to give the council that flexibility. Mr. Clark suggested the council resolve that issue later. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka said the council already had comparables in the form of a market survey. He suggested that the <br />council could just adjust that. He did not think the City should do a new market survey every year and <br />suggested that five year intervals were appropriate. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy suggested that the council needed to create a statement about what it was trying to achieve <br />with the proposed compensation approach. She thought the council was trying to create an unbiased and <br />more routine way to compensate the manager while encouraging excellence. She thought the council needed <br />to be able to explain to the public in challenging economic times why it was doing what it was doing and <br />why it was fair. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor suggested the council could move forward to systematize the compensation element of the <br />evaluation, and thought could be done quickly. He did not think the system needed to vary much between <br />the manager and Police Auditor. Ms. Holmes anticipated that staff would also return with changes to the <br />ratings. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the work session at 7:10 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Beth Forrest <br />City Recorder <br /> <br />(Recorded by Kimberly Young) <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—City Council September 27, 2010 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br />