Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mayor Piercy complimented staff on its commitment to the Envision Eugene process. She appreciated <br />staff’s outreach to the Board of County Commissioners, and asked that staff’s outreach effort included the <br />Housing Policy Board and Human Rights Commission. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor was impressed with the breadth and diversity of those on the CRG. He acknowledged the subject <br />of community growth was scary to some people. He appreciated the inclusive, accessible, non-technical <br />approach taken by staff, which brought in many people who had not participated in the past. That informed <br />his belief that it was better to do the process right than do it fast. Mr. Pryor believed that a holistic <br />discussion was necessary and was the only way to reach a solution that connected all the different pieces of <br />the solution. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark thanked staff for its work. He continued to be concerned about the process time line and the <br />potential of legislative action related to that. He was happy to hear staff was checking in with the County <br />and hoped that included new commissioners. Given Springfield’s experience trying to work with the board, <br />Mr. Clark was concerned that the Board of County Commissioners would delay the process. He hoped staff <br />did more to engage the County board so it understood that it did not get to re-write the rules or the basis by <br />which Eugene made its decisions. He called for further review of the rules governing the co-adoption <br />process. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling also thanked staff, the members of the CRG, and the residents who were participating. He <br />believed the plan constituted very important work. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling expressed concern that the depictions related to the work of the West Eugene Collaborative <br />(WEC) could be misinterpreted and recommended that staff reinforce the hypothetical nature of the <br />examples. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling also appreciated that staff was checking in with the Board of County Commissioners and asked <br />that staff report back to the council about the type of issues the board was raising and the staff response to <br />them. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling was not concerned that the State would intervene in the City’s process but he did not want to go <br />beyond the council-imposed deadline to demonstrate to the community the council could act in a timely way <br />to reach a reasonable conclusion. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka acknowledged staff’s hard work. He believed the City was on the right track. He agreed with <br />Mr. Pryor that it was more important to get the work done right rather than fast but he also shared Mr. <br />Poling’s belief the council needed to stick to the timeline. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka expressed disappointment in the last CRB panel discussion, terming it one-dimensional, <br />traditional, “rear-view mirror thinking.” The discussion had not been forward-thinking enough for him, <br />particularly as it regarded the “new green economy” and where the community wanted to position itself. He <br />did not think Eugene could plan for tomorrow with yesterday’s knowledge. He said traditional incentives <br />often did not realize what they were intended and sometimes had a negative net impact. He wanted to think <br />more broadly. <br /> <br />Speaking to Mr. Poling’s concerns about the visual depictions created for the WEC, Mayor Piercy noted the <br />time community members put into developing those depictions and said the WEC members represented a <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council October 13, 2010 Page 2 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />