Laserfiche WebLink
Laurel Hayles <br />, 1264 Delores Court, a bus commuter, had concerns about the proposed West Eugene EmX <br />route. She said the project would require cuts to LTD bus service but a feeder bus route system was needed <br />to get people to the line. LTD already was cutting and merging routes and buses were running with standing <br />room only. People in wheel chairs could not get on to the bus, and things would only get worse if EmX was <br />implemented. She said if LTD could not afford the bus system now in place, she questioned how it could <br />operate the EmX system in the long-term. Ms. Hayles believed that until that question was addressed, no <br />feasible system could be evaluated or implemented. Until that occurred, she was very opposed to the project <br />and wanted LTD to look at alternatives that worked with the existing system. She said an EmX route on <br />th <br />West 11 Avenue was not a viable option. She pointed out that if businesses along the road shut down it <br />would affect LTD’s payroll tax revenues. <br /> <br />th <br />Kim Sawyer <br />, 2170 Greenview Street, said he owned a business on West 11 Avenue that would survive the <br />construction of an EmX route but he was aware of other businesses that would not. He said that many of <br />the project’s opponents favored good public transportation, which they believed was in place now. He <br />thought it was fiscally irresponsible for LTD to spend money on the project and questioned how LTD could <br />th <br />operate an EmX vehicle six times an hour when it could not serve West 11 Avenue four times an hour now. <br />He asked the council to be fiscally responsible and reject the federal money available for the project so it <br />could be applied to the national deficit instead. <br /> <br />th <br />Roy Benson <br />, 570 Fillmore Street, said he owned a business on West 6 Avenue. He was not anti-transit <br />but supported the remarks of others speaking against the system. He said that hundreds of pieces of <br />property were affected by the proposed route and he believed the extensive use of eminent domain that he <br />envisioned necessary to realize the route to be an abuse of power. He asked the council to do the fiscally <br />responsible thing and reject the route. <br /> <br />thth <br />Brent Woodrich <br />, 2700 West 11 Avenue, said that during his lifetime West 11 Avenue had been an <br />industrial park that one went to for lumber and similar goods. He did not envision that anyone would use <br />EmX to go to the grocery store or to pick up lumber. He felt the community was in a situation where <br />everyone had to tighten their belts and pointed out that businesses had trouble making ends meet over the <br />last five years. He suggested the City consider such a project in better economic times and not at a time <br />when schools were having fund raisers. He understood that EmX was important and thought it was needed <br />in other parts of town and should serve residential areas to get people to other parts of the community. <br /> <br />th <br />Bob Machione <br />, 288 West 6 Avenue, thanked councilors Ortiz and Pryor for meeting with West Eugene <br />businesses regarding their concerns about EmX. He expressed concern that LTD staff kept accusing West <br />Eugene business owners of putting out misinformation. They were not, and he took exception to the <br />accusation. He said that LTD was not explaining to business owners how it would operate the system if it <br />were implemented. He said that LTD was facing budgetary shortfalls now and was cutting routes to <br />implement EmX. The LTD Board of Directors did not appear to be aware the Gateway route would cost <br />more than $1 million annually to operate. They insisted there was no increased cost from EmX, which Mr. <br />Machione asserted was misinformation. <br /> <br />Mr. Machione said the Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 90 listed 26 case studies for bus rapid <br />transit (BRT) and all the communities listed had far more people than Eugene-Springfield. In many cases, <br />the communities involved were major destinations. He asked who would run the system, and who would pay <br />for it. No urban basis to support the system, which he termed it a pipe dream. He said that LTD did not <br />have the funds to run the current bus service and would cut services again in the next year. He anticipated <br />that with operating costs at $1 million per route, LTD would soon run out of money. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—City Council October 25, 2010 Page 2 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />