Laserfiche WebLink
 <br /> Andrea—move ahead with strategy that gives us good information—egueen asdestigation andhas <br />diverse population. <br /> <br /> Alan—near consensus agreement on strategies and what levels they should be employed to? UGB. <br />(HML approach to tool box, be aggressive with strategiges and tactics in recognition of five-year <br />update) <br /> <br /> Betty—focus on infill and brownfield redevelopment. Don’t force the assumption of 34,000— <br />consider stable or more <br /> <br /> George P—strategy to address UGB and Eugene future agreeable to most in time for deadline. Like <br />strategy strategy but need to see more. Try and speed the process along, don’t let it get bogged <br />down. Five-year update—make a maximum of five years and build in flexibility to revise sooner. <br /> <br /> Mike—that the council agrees on a new UGB by February. With regard to plan presented today, <br />ensure reality=-based tactics. <br /> <br /> Emily—PC and CC collectively and confidently identify ways to accommodate population and <br />employment needs. If decide to do five-year check-in, be specific about what the City will be look- <br />ing at then to avoid a new Envision Eugene process. <br /> <br /> Richard—Short and we live happily ever after if it works. Don’t neglect the tough choices—these <br />decisions will affect the entire community and they need to reflect the community. Consider reshap- <br />ing Eugene as opposed to growing Eugene—trade off unusable lands. Recognize a long-term deci- <br />sion—we may be precluded today from something we can accomplish tomorrow. ® <br /> <br /> Ann—plan specific and comprehensive enough to guide fuure growth and livability issues, therefore <br />Eugene prospers, etc. advice—consider keeping CRG together in some fluid form to do occasional <br />check-ins <br /> <br /> Chris—to achieve broad community support or at least acceptance. Accommodate and accept that <br />human nature has to be part of the decision. Not afraid of revolutionary ideas, but that a governing <br />factor <br /> <br /> George—that the council receive accurate and useful information in February with different layers <br />and scenarios it could review, choose from, or keep in reserve. <br /> <br /> Lisa—that the strategies to increase efficiency and use of the land in UGB are sound, realistic, and <br />numerous, and the council has an easy time accepting it to limit the expansion of the UGB and <br />maintain our lifestyle. Look to larger communities with beautiful open space and natural resources <br />of 1 million or so to see how they live. <br /> <br />Ms. Weiss discussed next steps in the process. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Taylor, Ms. Weiss confirmed that the CRG had discussed exclusionary <br />zoning. <br /> <br />City Manager Ruiz thanked the participants for their attendance and acknowledged much work remained to <br />be done. He anticipated staff would continue to bring the two groups together. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said stuff <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy adjourned the meeting at 7:xx p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Bierle closed the Planning Commission meeting at 7:50 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—City Council November 22, 2010 Page 5 <br /> <br />