My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2011
>
CC Agenda - 01/24/11 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/21/2011 1:55:31 PM
Creation date
1/21/2011 1:19:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/24/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
long-term planning that provided adequate water for Veneta. Mr. Nye believed EWEB was the most viable <br />option. It had a secure, dependable water source that could be depended on for domestic, commercial, <br />industrial, and public safety needs. Recent wells had not been very productive. He said a finding by the <br />Oregon Water Resources Department restricted Veneta’s access to future groundwater sources. Mr. Ney <br />said that Veneta had secured federal funding to construct the necessary pipeline but an agreement with <br />EWEB must be in place before the public process can begin. He emphasized that time was of the essence. <br />He asked the council to support the agreement. <br /> <br />Brian Issa <br />, PO Box 458, Veneta, Public Works Director of Veneta, discussed the opposition to the Veneta <br />water contract. He said the opposition was based on assertions that approval of the sale would lead to <br />sprawl and rampant growth, and Veneta itself had been referred to as sprawl and a subdivision of Eugene. <br />Those in opposition would have the council act as the arbiter of growth in the region by using water as a <br />tool to impede growth in the outlying incorporated communities. He asked the council to consider the <br />contract for what it was, an agreement for EWEB to sell a very small amount of water to a neighboring <br />community so it could continue to pursue its community development goals in the context of Oregon’s land <br />use system. Mr. Issa urged the council to look at Veneta’s planning documents when considering assertions <br />that growth in Veneta was unplanned. He said that Veneta was far ahead of many communities in ensuring <br />growth occurred conscientiously. He said that many in opposition would suggest the contract would lead to <br />rampant growth, but Veneta had experienced growth without abundant water. <br /> <br />Dave Davanzo <br />, vice president of the Fern Ridge Chamber of Commerce, said his organization believed a <br />healthy business climate enriched the lives of everyone and it was committed to working with the City to <br />attract new jobs and industry to Veneta and for its residents. He said Veneta was disadvantaged by the lack <br />of a reliable, secure source of water. Water was vital to Veneta residents and critical if the city was to be <br />successful in attracting new business to the area. He noted that the community’s best producing well sites <br />could not be drawn from because the water originated in the Long Tom River and Fern Ridge Reservoir. <br />The surface water from the Long Tom was already committed and it would take an act of Congress to gain <br />access to the Fern Ridge Reservoir; even if Veneta gained access to the reservoir, treatment costs would be <br />excessive. Mr. Davanzo supported the Veneta water contract, saying it made sense, was the right thing to <br />do, and ensured Veneta's future economic independence <br /> <br />Jim Eagle Eye <br />, 25456 Hunter Road, Veneta, chair of the Veneta Planning Commission, encouraged the <br />council to support the agreement between Veneta and EWEB for the sale of surplus water to Veneta. He <br />pointed out that Oregon law required Veneta to provide adequate water for projected growth over the next <br />20 years. Water was critical to Veneta’s ability to both recruit commercial and industrial investment to <br />provide more employment opportunities and services to all residents and to improve residential development <br />so that it could protect its natural resources and continue to grow into a city that could provide its residents <br />with a distinctive quality of life. <br /> <br />Mr. Eagle Eye emphasized the importance of timely action due to the nature of the grant/loan funding that <br />would underwrite Veneta’s costs for pipeline construction. He also emphasized the jobs that pipeline <br />construction would bring to the region. <br /> <br />Mr. Eagle Eye encouraged the Eugene City Council to continue discussing the issue of regional water <br />planning. <br /> <br />Mr. Eagle Eye concluded by saying that Veneta’s projected future growth and increases in commercial and <br />industrial development could be met within its Urban Growth Boundary and should not be considered <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council December 13, 2010 Page 9 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.