Laserfiche WebLink
other modes. Measures PM 8a through PM 8e indicate the relative percentage share for wall <br />bike, bus, shared -ride auto, and drive -alone auto trips. The most si cant changes are the 49.2 <br />: percent increase in translt.mode share and the 9.1 percent decline in drive -alone #rips. The <br />decline in bike mode share is due in large part to the significant improvements in transit provided <br />by Bus Rapid Transit. As shown in PM 8f, there is an overall increase in the use of alternative <br />modes under the Financially Constrained TransPlan. <br />PM 8f is the sum of all non -auto (walk, bike, and bus) trips. Model analysis indicates that non - <br />auto mode shares increase by about 18 percent under the Financially Constrained TransPlan. <br />PM 8g provides -an aggregate estimate of the region's reliance on the auto. Total s erson trips <br />p <br />taken in the region are divided by the total number of auto trips. The objective is to increase the <br />overall number of person trips taken relative to total auto trips. Model results suggest that <br />gg person <br />p <br />trips per auto trip will increase by approximately 7 percent under the Financially Constrained <br />TransPlan. <br />Percent Change in Mode Share Measures - An 'lops <br />( /0 change from 1995) <br />Percent Change <br />20 1 / 1 0 -10"/0 0 0 /0 10 0 /0 20 % 30% 40% 50% 60% <br />Population <br />Eniployn not <br />Walk <br />w .t" <br />Transit <br />shamed Ride (2 or mev ) <br />Drive Alone <br />%Non - Auto Trips <br />Plasm Trips per Auto Trip <br />TransPlan July 2002 <br />Chapter 4, Page 9 <br />