Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mayor Piercy noted that citizens were questioning why the City’s portion of the funding was discounted by a <br />larger fraction than the residents’ assessment portion. Mr. Schoening reiterated that the funds that would <br />have been used by the City were not fungible and could not be used for other purposes. He explained that <br />the reductions in those particular areas could not be utilized to offset the assessments to the area residents. <br />When the bids came in lower in a number of areas, the assessments to the residents and the costs to the City <br />were reduced by different amounts. <br /> <br />At Mr. Ruiz’ suggestion, Mr. Schoening reviewed the table delineating the funding sources for the City’s <br />share of costs contained in the memorandum entitled Crest Drive/Storey Boulevard/Friendly Street Local <br />Improvement District dated June 22, 2009, and the reductions to them that the lower bidding environment <br />had brought about. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor indicated her preference to take the entire $500,000 and apply it to offset the Crest Drive <br />area assessments. She understood that there was not enough council support to do so. She asked if there <br />were not a greater number of people in the Crest Drive/Storey Boulevard area that could only access their <br />residences via those streets but who did not have to pay the assessments. Mr. Schoening responded that this <br />was correct. Councilor Taylor construed that this meant that those residents were paying more for the <br />benefit of other people than residents in the other projects. <br /> <br />Mr. Schoening said if one considered that the people who benefited were the people who traveled the road, <br />one could construe that the Elmira Road/Maple Street area residents were providing this benefit to a greater <br />number of people than the Crest Drive area residents. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor clarified that she was referring to the number of people who could only access their <br />residences via area streets. She said this was why she thought the Crest Drive LID should receive all of the <br />money to offset assessments. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to approve the Hearings Official’s <br />Minutes, Findings, and Recommendations of June 8, 2009. Roll call vote; the motion <br />passed, 7:1; Councilor Clark voting in opposition. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to adopt Resolution 4984 forming <br />a Local Improvement District for paving, constructing curbs, sidewalks, medians, street <br />lights, stormwater drainage and water quality facilities on Crest Drive from Blanton Road <br />to Lincoln Street, Storey Boulevard from Crest Drive to Lorane Highway, and Friendly <br />th <br />Street from Lorane Highway to 28 Avenue (Job # 4546). <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor indicated she would vote for the motion despite her concern for the people who had to pay <br />the amount of money they were going to be assessed. She averred that there were some people who could <br />not afford the assessment and there were other people who were strongly supportive of moving the project <br />forward, but were not being assessed. She said it was urgent that the streets get repaired and she understood <br />that it would cost substantially more if the project was delayed a year. She related that if they waited until <br />the council had a chance to change the method of payment, she could not be sure that any substantial <br />changes would take place. She noted that she had been assured by some people who lived in that area that <br />they would be willing to help defray the cost though they were not being directly assessed. She said <br />donations to the project would be tax deductible. She hoped that some people would consider making such <br />donations. <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 22, 2009 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />